Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:28:54.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the need of maincrop potatoes for late nitrogen by using isobutylidene di-urea, by injecting trification inhibitors with aqueous N fertilizers and by dividing dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Penny ,
T. M. Addiscott  and
F. V. Widdowson
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
T. M. Addiscott
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In experiments with maincrop potatoes at Rothamsted in 1976, 1977 and 1978 ‘Nitro-Chalk’ was broadcast, either as a single dressing on the seed bed, or half on the seed bed and half at tuber initiation. Isobutylidene di-urea was broadcast on the seed bed and aqueous ammonia was injected into the seed bed, without a nitrification inhibitor or with either ‘N-Serve’ (nitrapyrin) or sodium trithiocarbonate; all were compared with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ at rates of 200 or 300 kg N/ha. Additionally, single dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ supplied 150, 250, 350 and 400 kg N/ha. In similar experiments at Woburn in 1979 and 1980 aqueous urea replaced aqueous ammonia and the additional amounts of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ (100 and 400 kg N/ha) were tested as both single and divided dressings. Winter wheat was grown in each of the following years to measure residual effects.

Retaining half of the total N dressing of 200 or 300 kg N/ha as ‘Nitro-Chalk’ until tuber initiation improved yields at Rothamsted in 1976 and 1978 when irrigation was applied but not in 1977 when it was not. Dividing the N at Woburn improved yields at 100 and 400 kg N/ha but not at 200 or 300 kg N/ha. At Rothamsted injected aqueous ammonia was on average similar in effect to the undivided ‘Nitro-Chalk’ dressing at 300 kg N/ha, but less effective at 200 kg N/ha. In 1977, the wettest summer, it was, however, the most effective of the N-sources, provided that an inhibitor had been applied with it. At Woburn, injected aqueous urea did not differ consistently in effectiveness from ‘Nitro-Chalk’ and inhibitors did not improve its performance. Isobutylidene di-urea (IBDU) gave the smallest yields at both farms, apparently because it was too slowly available. Tuber size distributions were affected little by the amount or the form of N.

IBDU residues increased wheat yields the most following the potatoes at Rothamsted. This apart, the N-sources had similar residual values.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 577 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addiscott, T. M. (1977). A simple computer model for leaching in structured soils. Journal of Soil Science 28, 554–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J., Briggs, G. G., Evans, A. A. & Matula, J. (1977). Inhibition of nitrification by nitrapyrin, carbon disulphide and trithiocarbonate. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 673–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J., Penny, A., Widdowson, F. V. & Briggs, G. G. (1980). The effects of injecting nitrapyrin (‘N-Serve’), carbon disulphide or trithiocarbonates, with aqueous ammonia, on yield and %N of grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 229–237.Google Scholar
Avery, B. W. (1964). The soils and land use of the district round Aylesbury and Hemel Hempstead. Memoir of the Soil Survey of Great Britain.Google Scholar
Burns, I. G. (1976). Equation to predict the leaching of nitrate uniformly incorporated to a known depth or uniformly distributed throughout a soil profile. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catt, J. A., Weir, A. H., King, D. W., Le Riche, H. H., Pruden, G. & Norrish, R. E. (1977). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. II. Lansomc, White Horse and School Fields. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1976, Part 2, pp. 5–32.Google Scholar
Cox, D. & Addiscott, T. M. (1976). Sulphur-coated urea as a fertilizer for potatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 1015–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunasena, H. P. M. & Harris, P. M. (1969). The effect of CCC and nitrogen on the growth and yield of the second early potato variety Craig's Royal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, A. & Marschner, H. (1971). Einfluss der Stickstoffernahrung der Kartoffeln auf Induktion und Wachstumrat der Knolle. Zeitschrifi fur Pflanzenerndhrung und Bodenkunde 128, 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. O. (1934). The effect of a controlled nitrogen supply with different temperatures and photoperiods upon the development of the potato plant. Research Bulletin of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station No. 75. 132 pp.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, R. C. (1972). Results from an experiment comparing aqueous ammonia with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ for grazed grass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar