Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:21:26.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2015

U. B. NIDUMOLU ,
P. T. HAYMAN ,
Z. HOCHMAN ,
H. HORAN ,
D. R. REDDY ,
G. SREENIVAS  and
D. M. KADIYALA
U. B. NIDUMOLU*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Adelaide Laboratories, Gate 4, Waite Rd, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
P. T. HAYMAN
Affiliation:
South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), Hartley Grove Road, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
Z. HOCHMAN
Affiliation:
CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, EcoSciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia
H. HORAN
Affiliation:
CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, EcoSciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia
D. R. REDDY
Affiliation:
PJTS Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India
G. SREENIVAS
Affiliation:
PJTS Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India
D. M. KADIYALA
Affiliation:
ICRISAT, Patancheru, Hyderabad, India
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Climate risk assessment in cropping is generally undertaken in a top-down approach using climate records while critical farmer experience is often not accounted for. In the present study, set in south India, farmer experience of climate risk is integrated in a bottom-up participatory approach with climate data analysis. Crop calendars are used as a boundary object to identify and rank climate and weather risks faced by smallhold farmers. A semi-structured survey was conducted with experienced farmers whose income is predominantly from farming. Interviews were based on a crop calendar to indicate the timing of key weather and climate risks. The simple definition of risk as consequence × likelihood was used to establish the impact on yield as consequence and chance of occurrence in a 10-year period as likelihood. Farmers’ risk experience matches well with climate records and risk analysis. Farmers’ rankings of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ seasons also matched up well with their independently reported yield data. On average, a ‘good’ season yield was 1·5–1·65 times higher than a ‘poor’ season. The main risks for paddy rice were excess rains at harvesting and flowering and deficit rains at transplanting. For cotton, farmers identified excess rain at harvest, delayed rains at sowing and excess rain at flowering stages as events that impacted crop yield and quality. The risk assessment elicited from farmers complements climate analysis and provides some indication of thresholds for studies on climate change and seasonal forecasts. The methods and analysis presented in the present study provide an experiential bottom-up perspective and a methodology on farming in a risky rainfed climate. The methods developed in the present study provide a model for end-user engagement by meteorological agencies that strive to better target their climate information delivery.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 8 , November 2015 , pp. 1380 - 1393
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aggarwal, P. K., Baethegan, W. E., Cooper, P., Gommes, R., Lee, B., Meinke, H., Rathore, L. S. & Sivakumar, M. V. K. (2010). Managing climatic risks to combat land degradation and enhance food security: key information needs. Procedia Environmental Sciences 1, 305–312.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. (2002). Indigenous Knowledge and the Politics of Classification. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Balaghi, R., Badjeck, M. C., Bakari, D., De Pauw, E., De Wit, A., Defourny, P., Donato, S., Gommes, R., Jlibene, M., Ravelo, A. C., Sivakumar, M. V. K., Telahigue, N. & Tychon, B. (2010). Managing climatic risks for enhanced food security: key information capabilities. Procedia Environmental Sciences 1, 313–323.Google Scholar
Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework. Working Paper 38. Norwich, UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change.Google Scholar
Brown, C. & Baroang, K. M. (2011). Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Communication: Methods for Climate Variability and Change. London: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jager, J. & Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 100, 8086–8091.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1983). Putting the Last First. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Christens, B. & Speer, P. W. (2006). Tyranny/transformation: power and paradox in participatory development. Review essay. In Participation: The New Tyranny (Eds Cooke, B. & Kothari, U.). New York: Zed Books. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/91/189 Google Scholar
Coe, R. & Stern, R. D. (2011). Assessing and addressing climate-induced risk in sub-saharan rainfed agriculture: lessons learned. Experimental Agriculture 47, 395–410.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. & Coe, R. (2011). Assessing and addressing climate-induced risk in sub-Saharan rainfed agriculture. Foreword to a special issue of Experimental Agriculture. Experimental Agriculture 47, 179–184.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Dimes, J., Rao, K. P. C., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B. & Twomlow, S. (2008). Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: an essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 126, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gommes, R. (1998). Climate related risk in agriculture. In IPCC Expert Meeting on Risk Management Methods, pp. 13. Toronto, Canada: AES, Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Hardaker, J., Huirne, R. & Anderson, J. (1997). Coping with Risk in Agriculture. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Hay, J. (2007). Extreme weather and climate events and farming risks. In Managing Weather and Climate Risks in Agriculture (Eds Sivakumar, M. V. K. & Motha, R. P.), pp. 1–19. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Hearn, A. B. (1994). OZCOT: a simulation model for cotton crop management. Agricultural Systems 44, 257–299.Google Scholar
Helm, P. (1996). Integrated risk management for natural and technological disasters. Tephra 15, 4–13.Google Scholar
Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (2001). Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Holzworth, D. P., Huth, N. I., deVoil, P. G., Zurcher, E. J., Herrmann, N. I., McLean, G., Chenu, K., van Oosterom, E. J., Snow, V., Murphy, C., Moore, A. D., Brown, H., Whish, J. P. M., Verral, S., Fainges, J., Bell, L. W., Peake, A. S., Poulton, P. L., Hochman, Z., Thorburn, P. J., Gaydon, D. S., Dalgliesh, N. P., Rodriguez, D., Cox, H., Chapman, S., Doherty, A., Teixeira, E., Sharp, J., Cichota, R. & Vogeler, I. (2014). APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling and Software 62, 327–350.Google Scholar
Jarraud, M. (2007). Foreword. In Managing Weather and Climate Risks in Agriculture (Eds Sivakumar, M. & Motha, R.), pp. v–vi. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Jones, R. & Boer, R. (2004). Assessing Current Climate Risks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., McLean, G., Verburg, K., Snow, V., Dimes, J. P., Silburn, M., Wang, E., Brown, S., Bristow, K. L., Asseng, S., Chapman, S., McCown, R. L., Freebairn, D. M. & Smith, C. J. (2003). An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavi, H. S. & Tupper, G. J. (2004). Agrometeorology: Principles and Applications of Climate Studies in Agriculture. Binghamton, NY, USA: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Meinke, H., Nelson, R., Kokic, P., Stone, R., Selvaraju, R. & Baethgen, W. (2006). Climate Research Actionable climate knowledge: from analysis to synthesis. Climate Research 33, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murty, V. V. N. & Takeuchi, K. (1996). Assessment and mitigation of droughts in the Asia-Pacific region. In Land and Water Development for Agriculture in the Asia-Pacific Region (Eds Murty, V. V. N. & Takeuchi, K.), pp. 98–119. Barking, UK: Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M. & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 1766–1777.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141, 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C., Blackstock, K. & Carter, C. (2004). Practical Approaches to Participation. Aberdeen, UK: Macaulay Land Use Research Institute.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Tsiang, M., Rajaratnam, B. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2014). Observed changes in extreme wet and dry spells during the South Asian summer monsoon season. Nature Climate Change 4, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. & Motha, R. (2007). Managing weather and climate risks in agriculture – summary and recommendations. In Managing Weather and Climate Risks in Agriculture (Eds Sivakumar, M. V. K. & Motha, R.), pp. 477–491. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K., Das, H. P. & Brunini, O. (2005). Impacts of present and future climate variability and change on agriculture and forestry in the arid and semi-arid tropics. Climatic Change 70, 31–72.Google Scholar
Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values 35, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’, and Boundary objects: amateurs and professionals on Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science 19, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Reading (2008). Instat – an Interactive Statistical Package. Reading, UK: Statistical Services Centre, University of Reading.Google Scholar
WMO (2014). The WMO Strategy for Service Delivery and its Implementation Plan. Geneva: World Meteorological Organisation.Google Scholar