Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:49:00.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of varietal resistance to chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) infection of field beans (Vicia faba L.), with some indications of its heritability and mode of inheritance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Jennifer E. M. Elliott  and
W. J. Whittington
Jennifer E. M. Elliott
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.
W. J. Whittington
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Varietal differences in resistance to non-aggressive chocolate spot infection were detected in the field, although complete resistance was not observed. Following artificial inoculation under growth-room conditions, a parent–offspring regression of disease scores for the heterogeneous stock Chivers was estimated as 0·51 ± 0·24, and although this cannot be regarded as a reliable heritability estimate, it demonstrates a degree of additive genetic control. An F2 diallel cross, under field conditions, indicated resistance to be controlled mainly by dominant alleles within a system of partial dominance. Detached-leaf tests indicated that within virtually complete dominance systems, dominant alleles facilitate fungal penetration and induce a hypersensitive response within the leaf. Control of further lesion development was indicated to be effected by a virtually complete additive system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 411 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bond, D. A. (1960). Field beans. Annual Report Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, pp. 64–67.Google Scholar
Bond, D. A., Toynbee-Clark, G. & Pope, M. (1972). Field beans. Annual Report Plant Breeding Institute Cambridge, pp. 113–117.Google Scholar
Elliott, Jennifer E. M. & Whittington, W. J. (1978). The effect of soil pH on the severity of Chocolate Spot infection on field bean varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, B. I. (1954). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39, 789–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jinks, J. L. & Hayman, B. I. (1953). The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genetics Cooperative News Letter 27, 48–54.Google Scholar
Last, F. T. & Hamley, R. E. (1956). A local lesion technique for measuring the infectivity of conidia of Botrylis fabae Sardifla. Annals of Applied Biology 44, 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, J. W. (1972). Studies on the process of resistance of Vicia faba L. to infection by Botrytis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Mather, K. & Jinks, J. L. (1971). Biometrical Genetics, 2nd ed.London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Agricultural Advisory Service (1967). N.A.A.S./N.I.A.B. Primary Variety Trials, South- West Region. Report of Field Experiments, pp. 162–163.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Advisory Service (1968). N.A.A.S./N.I.A.B. Primary Variety Trials, South-West Region. Report of Field Experiments, pp. 110–111, 113–115.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A. & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized Linear Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A 135 (3), 370–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar