Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:13:11.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adverse effects on reproductive performance and lameness of feeding grazing dairy cows partially on silage indoors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. J. C. Phillips
C. J. C. Phillips
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eighty autumn-calving (A) and 82 spring-calving (S) British Friesian cows were divided during the grazing season into two groups: one group received silage overnight indoors and grazed herbage during the day (partial storage feeding, P) and the other was conventionally set-stocked (C). The effects of the four treatments (AC, AP, SC and SP) on reproductive performance and herd health are reported for the 27-week grazing season and the subsequent 25-week housed period in 1985/86 in North Wales. Calving to conception interval was not affected by treatment but, in treatment SP, pregnancy rate to all services was lower and number of barren cows was greater than in the other treatments. Partial storage feeding increased the incidence of under-run heel and laminitis in the early part of the grazing season, and this was reflected in poorer locomotion. Treatment SC resulted in an increased incidence of punctured sole with pus later in the grazing season. Both autumn-calving treatments resulted in a large decrease in lameness and poor locomotion at drying off, but these increased in the autumn before housing. The mean duration of each lameness incident was 1·88 months and, in 40 out of 97 incidents, lameness was preceded by uneven gait. The incidence of lameness and poor locomotion was low for all treatments throughout the housed period. It is concluded that a high standard of buildings and reproductive and herd health management is necessary for partial storage feeding to be practised successfully.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 253 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aston, K., Daley, S. R., & Gibbs, B. G. (1987). Effects of offering silage overnight in the early grazing season to autumn-calved cows. Animal Production 44, 173–182.Google Scholar
Baggot, D. G. & Russell, A. M. (1981). General consideration of the factors predisposing to lameness. British Veterinary Journal 137, 115–130.Google Scholar
Bell, E. M. & Miller, A. M. (1977). Lameness in dairy cattle. Internal Technical Memorandum, East of Scotland College of Agriculture No. 286, 3 pp.Google Scholar
Crosse, S. & Gleeson, P. (1987). Supplementation of autumn grass with silage and concentrates for grazing dairy cows in late lactation. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 69–75.Google Scholar
Hahn, M. V., McDaniel, B. T. & Wilk, J. C. (1986). Hoof growth and wear in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 2148–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, J. (1977). Conception, milk yield and bodyweight in Holstein cows. British Cattle Breeders' Club Digest 32, 88–93.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. & Webster, D. M. (1982). Assessment of lameness in dairy cattle. Crichton Royal Farm Report, West of Scotland College of Agriculture, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. & Webster, D. M. (1983). Assessment of lameness in dairy cattle on different systems of concentrate feeding. Crichton Royal Farm Report, West of Scotland College of Agriculture, pp. 27–29.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. (1989). Partial storage-feeding and season of calving for dairy cows. Research and Development in Agriculture 6, 151–159.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. & Leaver, J. D. (1986). The effect of forage supplementation on the behaviour of grazing dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. & Schofield, S. A. (In press). The effect of environment and stage of the oestrous cycle on the behaviour of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science.Google Scholar
Poole, A. H. (1984). Increasing return from cull cows and calves. Report, Farm Management Services Information Unit, No. 41, pp. 48. Reading: Milk Marketing Board.Google Scholar
Poole, D. A. (1987). All-year housing of dairy cows. Research and Development in Agriculture 4, 77–81.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. J. & Leaver, J. D. (1987). Storage feeding of dairy cows. Research and Development in Agriculture 4, 87–93.Google Scholar
Russell, A. M. & Weaver, A. D. (1978). The Compton Survey of Bovine Lameness 1977. Report of the 2nd Symposium on Bovine Digital Diseases, pp. 109–112. Skara: Veterinary Institute.Google Scholar
Ryan, B. F., Joiner, B. L. & Ryan, T. A. (1985). MINITAB Handbook. Boston: Dusbury Press.Google Scholar
Toussaint Raven, E. (1985). Cattle Footcare and Claw Trimming. Ipswich: Farming Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, D. A., Kelly, J. M. & Smith, E. J. (1983). Incidence of lameness in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 113, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar