Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:26:33.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Determines Productivity Growth of Agricultural Cooperatives?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Chatura B. Ariyaratne
Affiliation:
CSIRO Policy and Economic Research Unit Land in Kensington Gardens, Australia
Allen M. Featherstone
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Michael R. Langemeier
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Abstract

This paper examines productivity of a sample of grain marketing and farm supply cooperatives from 1990 to 1998. The cooperative industry's productivity or growth was mainly due to improvement in technology rather than improvement in pure efficiency or scale. The cooperative industry's productivity was primarily associated with the grain, fertilizer, and agrochemical product lines. Policies that raise fertilizer prices would encourage a cooperative to be technically more productive. In general, policies that raise prices of grain, fertilizer, and agrochemicals would encourage a cooperative to be more productive overall.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaja, A.O.Material Productivity in Food Manufacturing.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(February 1992): 179-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariyaratne, C.B., Featherstone, A.M., Langemeier, M.R., and Barton, D.G.. “Measuring X-Efficiency and Scale Efficiency for a Sample of Agricultural Cooperatives.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29,2(October 2000): 198207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, V.E., Bureau, J.-C., Nehring, R., and Somwaru, A.. “Agricultural Productivity Revisited.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(November 1997): 1045-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, V.E., Gollop, E.M., Kelly-Hawke, A., and Swinand, G.P.. “Patterns of State Productivity Growth in the U.S. Farm Sector: Linking State and Aggregate Models.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(February 1999): 164-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binswanger, H.P.Induced Technical Change: Evolution of Thought.” Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions and Development, Binswanger, H.P. ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Bruno, M.Raw materials, Profits, and the Productivity Slowdown.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics XCIX (February 1984): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., and Diewert, W.E.. “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers.The Economic Journal 92(March 1982): 7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.A.Economies of Scale and Scope at Depository Financial Institutions: A Review of Literature.Economic Review 73(September/October 1988): 1633.Google Scholar
Dean, E., Harper, M., and Otto, P.F.. “Improvements to the Quarterly Productivity Measures.” Monthly Labor Review (October 1995):2732.Google Scholar
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhang, Z.. “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries.The American Economic Review 84(March 1994):6683.Google Scholar
Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S.. Cost and Revenue Constrained Production. New York: Springer—Verlag, Inc., 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S.. Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R. Carter, and Judge, G.G.. Learning and Practicing Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.Google Scholar
Kraenzle, C.A., Richardson, R.M., Adams, C.C., DeVille, K.C., and Penn, J.E.. Farmer Cooperative Statistics 1998. Washington, DC: USDA, RB/CS, RBS Service Report 57, November 1999.Google Scholar
Malmquist, S.Index Numbers and Indifference Curves.Trabajos de Estatistica, 4(1)1953: 209-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Prices Received by Farmers: Historic Data Series and Indexes. 1999.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics. Economic Research Service, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Labor. Producer Price Index-Commodities. Bureau of Labor Statistics Data, various issues.Google Scholar