Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:40:25.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varietal Sales and Quality Differentiation: The Case of Certified Soybean Seed in the Southeastern U.S.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Jack E. Houston ,
Kihong Jeong  and
Stanley M. Fletcher
Jack E. Houston
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Athens
Kihong Jeong
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Athens
Stanley M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Griffin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variation in annual soybean plantings contributes to uncertainty in supplies of and demand for soybean seed in the southeastern U.S. This study used an expenditure valuation approach in an hedonic analysis framework to estimate returns to soybean seed quality differentiation. Analysis of pooled cross-sectional and time series observations narrowed important quality characteristics to yield and disease resistance attributes. In general, unexpected environmental factors affect seed crops over time, and the demand for other performance attributes is less predictable than for expected yield attributes. The results also suggest that geographical location is not significantly related to sales of varietal soybean seed in the study area.

Keywords

seed qualityhedonic input estimationexpenditure valuation
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , July 1989 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, K.C., Saunders, F. B. Wetzstein, M. E., and Moss, R.B.. An Analysis of the Demand for Inputs in Peanut Production at the Southwest Georgia Branch Station. Res. Bull. 310, University of Georgia College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Athens, Ga., 1984.Google Scholar
Bradley, J.P., Knittle, K.H., and Troyer, A.F.. “Statistical Methods in Seed Corn Product Selection.” Prod. Agric., 1 (1988):34–38.Google Scholar
Brorsen, W., Grant, W., and Rister, M.E.. “A Hedonic Price Model for Rough Rice Bid/Acceptance Markets.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 66(1984):156–163.Google Scholar
Carl, E., Kilmer, R.L., and Kenny, L.W.. “Evaluating Implicit Prices for Intermediate Products.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):592–595.Google Scholar
Fettig, L.P. “Adjusting Farm Factor Prices for Quality Changes.” J. Farm.Econ., 45(1963):599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. “The Demand for Fertilizer: An Economic Interpretation of a Structural Change.” J. Farm Econ., 40(1958):591–606.Google Scholar
Henning, S.A., and Eddleman, B.R.. “Intra- and Inter-State Transferability of Soybean Variety Research.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 18, 2(1986):7–13.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H.S. “Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed.” Rev. Econ. Studies., 19(1952): 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, K. “Market Share Valuation of Quality Differentiation in Certified Soybean Seed in the Southeast.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Georgia, 1988.Google Scholar
Jordan, J.L., Shewfelt, R. L., Prussia, S. E., and Hurst, W.C.. “Estimating the Price of Quality Characteristics for Tomatoes.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 17(1985):139–146.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W. “Survey of Promising Developments in Demand Analysis: Economics of Product Characteristics.” In New Directions in Econometric Modeling and Forecasting in U.S. Agriculture. Rausser, Gordon C., ed. New York: North Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W., and Martin, M.B.. “Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics.” Amer. J. Agr.Econ., 58(1976):21–30.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983.Google Scholar
McDonald, J.F., and Moffitt, R.A.. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 62(1980):318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, A.J., and Cowling, K.. “Demand for Farm Tractors in the United States and the United Kingdom.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 50(1986):896–912.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Models: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” J. Polit. Econ., 82(1974):34–55.Google Scholar
Smith, E.G., Knutson, R.D., and Richardson, J.W.. “Input and Market Economics: Impact on Structural Change in Cotton Farming on the Texas High Plains.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 68(1986):716–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. “Qualities, Prices and Budget Inquiries.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 19(1952):129–147.Google Scholar
U.S.D.A. The Uniform Soybean Tests, Southern Region, 1984. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Stoneville, Miss., 1984.Google Scholar
Waugh, F.V. “Quality Factors Influencing Vegetable Prices.” J. Farm. Econ., 10(1928):185–196.Google Scholar
Wilson, W.J. “Hedonic Prices in the Malting Barley Market.” Western J. Agr. Econ., 9(1984):29–40.Google Scholar