Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:57:24.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Valuing Agricultural Mortgage-Backed Securities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffrey R. Stokes
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Brian M. Brinch
Affiliation:
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation in Washington, DC

Abstract

A model to value Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac) agricultural mortgage-backed securities (AMBS) is developed and numerically solved. The results suggest prepayment penalties currently being used by Farmer Mac reduce yields on AMBS considerably. Even with prepayment penalties, it can be advantageous for profit maximizing mortgagors to optimally prepay or even default on agricultural mortgages. The model is used to quantify prepayment and default risk by valuing the embedded options in the mortgages. Monte Carlo simulation is also used to determine the probability of optimal prepayment given the term structure assumption used to develop the model.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkema, A., Drabenstott, M., and Froerer, L.A New Era in Farm Lending: Who Will Prosper?Economic Review (Fed. Res. Bank of Kansas City) 73,(1988):2238.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A., and Loren, I.Decomposition of Mortgage Spreads,” Chapter 1 in Advances in the Valuation and Management of Mortgage-Backed Securities, ed. Fabozzi, Frank J., Fabozzi Associates, New Hope, PA 1998.Google Scholar
Boyle, P.Options: A Monte Carlo Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics 4(1977):323338.Google Scholar
Boyle, P., Broadie, M., and Glasserman, P.Monte Carlo Methods for Security Pricing,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21(1997):12671321.Google Scholar
Brennan, M., and Schwartz, E.Savings Bonds, Retractable Bonds, and Callable Bonds,” Journal of Finanical Economics 5(1977):6788.Google Scholar
Brennan, M., and Schwartz, E.Determinants of GNMA Mortgage Prices,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 13(1987):209228.Google Scholar
Broadie, M., and Glasserman, P.Pricing American-Style Securities With Simulation,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21(1997):13231352.Google Scholar
Buser, S., and Hendershott, P.Pricing Default-Free Fixed-Rate Mortgages,” Housing Finance Review 3(1984):405429.Google Scholar
Chhikara, R., and Hanson, S.Competitive Pricing of Farmer Mac's Mortgage-Backed Securities and its Future Viability: A Contingent Claims Analysis Approach,” Review of Agricultural Economics 15(1993):547566.Google Scholar
Cox, J. J. Ingersoll, and Ross, S.An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Model of Asset Prices,” Econometrica 53(1985a):363384.Google Scholar
Cox, J. J. Ingersoll, and Ross, S.A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Econometrica 53(1985b):385407.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D., and Hendershott, P.Pricing FHA Mortgage Default Insurance,” Housing Finance Review 3(1984):373392.Google Scholar
Deng, Y., Quigley, J., and VanOrder, R.Mortgage Terminations, Heterogeneity and the Exercise of Mortgage Options,” Econometrica 68(2000):275308.Google Scholar
Dunn, K., and McConnell, J.Valuation of GNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities,” Journal of Finance 36(1981):599616.Google Scholar
Farm Credit Services (FCS), Real Estate Loans webpage (http://www.farmcredit.com), accessed July 21, 1999.Google Scholar
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (FAMC), 1998 Annual Report, Washington, D.C. 1999.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Interest rate data webpage (http://www.stls.frb.org/fred/data/irates.html), accessed April 15, 2000.Google Scholar
Foster, C., and VanOrder, R.An Option-Based Model of Mortgage Default,” Housing Finance Review 3(1984):351372.Google Scholar
Gemmili, G. Options Pricing: An International Perspective, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (GAO), Farmer Mac: Revised Charter Enhances Secondary Market Activity, but Growth Depends on Various Factors, Washington, D.C, GAO/GGD-99-85, 1999.Google Scholar
Green, J., and Shoven, J.The Effects of Interest Rates on Mortgage Prepayment, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 18(1986):4159.Google Scholar
Kau, J., Keenan, D., Muller, W., and Epperson, J.A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 24(1992):279299.Google Scholar
Kau, J., Keenan, D., Muller, W., and Epperson, J.The Valuation at Origination of Fixed-Rate Mortgages with Default and Prepayment,” Journal of Real Estate, Finance, and Economics 11(1995):536.Google Scholar
Kelly, A., and Slawson, V.Declining Mortgage Prepayment and the Value of Delay,” Working Paper, 2000.Google Scholar
Lefcoe, G.Mortgage Prepayment by Defeasance,” Olin Working Paper No. 99-13, University of Southern California Law School, Los Angeles, CA 1999.Google Scholar
Musiela, M., and Rutkowski, M., Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling, Berlin: Springer 1998.Google Scholar
Nowman, L.Gaussian Estimation of Single-Factor Continuous Time Models of the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance 52(1997):16951706.Google Scholar
Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., and Flannery, B. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, New York: Cambridge University Press 1993.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., and Torous, W.Prepayment and the Valuation of Mortgage-Backed Securities,” Journal of Finance 44(1989):375392.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., and Torous, W.Prepayment, Default, and the Valuation of Mortgage Pass-through Securities,” Journal of Business 65(1992):221239.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. Rational Prepayment and the Valuation of Mortgage-Backed Securities, Review of Financial Studies 8(1995):677708.Google Scholar
Titman, S., and Torous, W.Valuing Commercial Mortgages: An Empirical Investigation of the Contingent-Claims Approach to Pricing Risky Debt,” Journal of Finance 44(1989):345373.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, D.C. 1999.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service (USDA ERS), Land rent data web page (http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/ data-sets/land/90025/), accessed April 15, 2000.Google Scholar