Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Grebitus, Carola
Colson, Gregory
and
Menapace, Luisa
2012.
A Comparison of Hypothetical Survey Rankings with Consumer Shopping Behavior.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
Schulz, Lee L.
Schroeder, Ted C.
and
White, Katharine L.
2012.
Value of Beef Steak Branding: Hedonic Analysis of Retail Scanner Data.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 2,
p.
260.
Key, Nigel
and
Sneeringer, Stacy
2012.
Carbon Emissions, Renewable Electricity, and Profits: Comparing Policies to Promote Anaerobic Digesters on Dairies.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 2,
p.
139.
Chung, Chanjin
Briggeman, Brian C.
and
Han, Sungill
2012.
Willingness-to-Pay for Beef Quality Attributes: A Latent Segmentation Analysis of Korean Grocery Shoppers.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 4,
p.
447.
Langen, Nina
2013.
Ethics in Consumer Choice.
p.
19.
McAdams, Callie
Palma, Marco A.
Hall, Charles
and
Ishdorj, Ariun
2013.
A Nonhypothetical Ranking and Auction Mechanism for Novel Products.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
Lim, Kar H.
Hu, Wuyang
Maynard, Leigh J.
and
Goddard, Ellen
2014.
A Taste for Safer Beef? How Much Does Consumers’ Perceived Risk Influence Willingness to Pay for Country‐of‐Origin Labeled Beef.
Agribusiness,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Ridley, William
Devadoss, Stephen
and
Shook, Steven R.
2014.
Estimations of Consumer Demand for Local Beef.
Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 4,
p.
316.
Rausser, Gordon
Zilberman, David
and
Kahn, Gabriel
2015.
An Alternative Paradigm for Food Production, Distribution, and Consumption: A Noneconomist’s Perspective.
Annual Review of Resource Economics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
309.
Lim, Kar H.
and
Hu, Wuyang
2016.
How Local Is Local? A Reflection on Canadian Local Food Labeling Policy from Consumer Preference.
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 1,
p.
71.
Johnson, M. D.
Miller, R. K.
Morrill, J. C.
Anderson, D. P.
Wickersham, T. A.
Sawyer, J. E.
Richardson, J. W.
and
Palma, M. A.
2016.
The influence of taste in willingness-to-pay valuations of sirloin steaks from postextraction algal residue–fed cattle.
Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 7,
p.
3072.
Tichenor, Nicole E.
Peters, Christian J.
Norris, Gregory A.
Thoma, Greg
and
Griffin, Timothy S.
2017.
Life cycle environmental consequences of grass-fed and dairy beef production systems in the Northeastern United States.
Journal of Cleaner Production,
Vol. 142,
Issue. ,
p.
1619.
Wu, Linhai
Gong, Xiaoru
Qin, Shasha
Chen, Xiujuan
Zhu, Dian
Hu, Wuyang
and
Li, Qingguang
2017.
Consumer preferences for pork attributes related to traceability, information certification, and origin labeling: Based on China's Jiangsu Province.
Agribusiness,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
424.
Sacolo, Thabo
and
Abidoye, Babatunde
2017.
Are long-held beliefs and taboos on recycled water reducing in Southern Africa?1.
Water Policy,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 6,
p.
1172.
Lim, Kar
Vassalos, Michael
and
Reed, Michael
2018.
Point-of-Sale Specific Willingness to Pay for Quality-Differentiated Beef.
Sustainability,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 7,
p.
2560.
Sonoda, Yuta
Oishi, Kazato
Chomei, Yosuke
and
Hirooka, Hiroyuki
2018.
How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?.
Meat Science,
Vol. 146,
Issue. ,
p.
75.
Ardeshiri, Ali
and
Rose, John Matthew
2018.
How Australian consumers value intrinsic and extrinsic attributes of beef products.
Food Quality and Preference,
Vol. 65,
Issue. ,
p.
146.
LI, XIAOGU
JENSEN, KIMBERLY L.
LAMBERT, DAYTON M.
and
CLARK, CHRISTOPHER D.
2018.
CONSEQUENTIALITY BELIEFS AND CONSUMER VALUATION OF EXTRINSIC ATTRIBUTES IN BEEF.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Concha‐Meyer, Anibal A.
Durham, Catherine A.
Colonna, Ann E.
Hasenbeck, Aimee
Sáez, Bárbara
and
Adams, Michael R.
2019.
Consumer Response to Tomato Pomace Powder as an Ingredient in Bread: Impact of Sensory Liking and Benefit Information on Purchase Intent.
Journal of Food Science,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 12,
p.
3774.
Xu, Lingling
Yang, Xixi
Wu, Linhai
Chen, Xiujuan
Chen, Lu
and
Tsai, Fu-Sheng
2019.
Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 19,
p.
3616.