Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:40:47.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University Outlook Programs: A Review and Some Suggestions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

H. M. Harris Jr.
H. M. Harris Jr.*
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Conducting an outlook program appears to be simple. The aim of outlook is to accurately predict future economic conditions and to rapidly disseminate this information to producers, agribusiness firms and/or consumers, to help them make intelligent production, purchasing and marketing decisions. But those involved know that the appearance of simplicity in conducting an outlook effort is deceiving. Outlook work is frustrating—sometimes gratifying-just as often, humiliating.

The focus here is upon outlook programs in agricultural economics department of the land-grant universities. The role of USDA in outlook work is discussed only in the context of its support of state efforts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , December 1976 , pp. 139 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The constructive comments of Larry Bauer, Ed Faris, Joe Havlicek, David Kenyon, and three reviewers for this Journal are gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1] Bottum, J. Carroll. “Changing Functions of Outlook in the U.S.,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 48, No. 5, December 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Business Week. “Special Report: The New Science of Business Forecasting,” No. 1360, September 24, 1955.Google Scholar
[3] Cavin, J.P. “Interpreting the Facts,” After 100 Years, The Yearbook of Agriculture, USDA, 1962.Google Scholar
[4] Cromarty, William A. “Needed Improvements in Application of Models for Agriculture Commodity Price Forecasting,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 57, No. 2, May 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Daly, Rex F. “Current Questions on National Agricultural Outlook,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 48, No. 5, December 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Eisgruber, Ludwig M. “Research Support for Continuing Education,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 54, No. 5, December 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Extension Committee on Organization and Policy. Extension Education for a Growing Agriculture, February 1974.Google Scholar
[8] King, Gordon A. “Econometric Models of the Agricultural Sector,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 57, No. 2, May 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Newell, S.R. and Warrington., S.T. “Facts for Decision,” After 100 Years, The Yearbook of Agriculture, USDA, 1962.Google Scholar
[10] Pelsue, Neil. Utilization of Production and Marketing Information by Maine Potato Farmers, Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 716, April 1975.Google Scholar
[11] Stanton, B. F. “Clientele for Continuing Education in the 1970's,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 54, No. 5, December 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Timm, Tyrus R. “Proposals for Improvement of the Agricultural Outlook Program of the United States,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 48, No. 5, December 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] U.S.D.A., Extension Service. Highlights... Agricultural and Natural Resources, 1974.Google Scholar