No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Structural Change in Higher Education: Implications for Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Extract
The political and economic environment in which agricultural research is conducted is changing. The methods of funding research are changing, food markets are international in scope, and the public is demanding greater accountability in higher education. These trends are creating new tensions within the agricultural research system, and the heightening of these tensions requires that a new equilibrium be established between the system's public mission and the competing public demands on the system (Danbom). This new equilibrium will determine the structure and performance of the agricultural research system in the coming decade.
- Type
- Invited Papers and Discussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993
References
Bahl, Roy W. Jr. “Changing Federalism: Trends and Interstate Variation.” In The Changing Face of Fiscal Federalism, edited by Swartz, Thomas R and Peck, John E.. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1990.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin W. and Wildasin, David E.. Public Sector Economics. 2nd rev. ed. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Bonnen, James T. “A Century of Science in Agriculture: Lessons for Science Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68 (1986): 1065–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnen, James T. “Changing Roles Agricultural Economists and Their Institutions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 74 (1992) 1259–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Graeme. “Colleges at the Trough.” The National Journal. March 7, 1992, pp. 565–569.Google Scholar
Chubin, Daryl E. and Edward J, Hackett. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service. Trends in the Apparent Distribution of Apparent Academic Earmarb in the Federal Government's FY 1980-92 Appropriations Bills. A report prepared for the Committee ci Science, Space, and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives. September 1992a.Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service. The Distribution of Apparent Academic Earmarks in the Federal Government's FY Appropriations Bills. A report prepared for the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives. September 1992b.Google Scholar
Conlan, Timothy J. “The Disappearing 10th Amendment: Conflicting Trends, Competing Futures.” The Journal of State Government. 62 (1989): 50–55.Google Scholar
Cordes, Colleen. “Senate Committee Opens Debate on Earmarking Funds; U. of Cal., a Foe of ‘Pork-Barrel’ Projects, Seeks One.” Chronicle of Higher Education. 35 (1989a): All and A19. June 28.Google Scholar
Cordes, Colleen. “Success at Winning Earmarked Funds May Leave Colleges With Little to Show for It.” Chronicle of Higher Education. 36 (1989b): A20. November 1.Google Scholar
Danbom, David B. “Research and Agriculture: Challenging the Public System.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 7 (1992): 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derthick, Martha. “Preserving Federalism: Congress, the States, and the Supreme Court.” The Brookings Review. 4 (1986): 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenson, Robert E., Waggoner, Paul E., and Vernon W, Ruttan. “Economic Benefits from Research: An Example From Agriculture.” Science. 205 (1979): 1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, Steven D. “State Finances in the New Era of Fiscal Federalism.” In The Changing Face of Fiscal Federalism, edited by Swartz, Thomas R and Peck, John E.. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1990.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Christopher and Wells, Donald T.. Federalism, Power, and Political Economy: A New Theory of Federalism's Impact on American Life. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David P. “Publishing by - and for? - the Numbers.” Science. 250 (1990): 1331–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, David P. “Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now?” Science. 251 (1991): 25.Google ScholarPubMed
Hardin, Clifford M. “Congress is the Problem.” Choices. Premiere Issue, 1986, pp. 6–10.Google Scholar
Lively, Kit, Mercer, Joye, and Whitfield, Tonya. “The Outlook for Higher Education in 50 State Legislatures.” Chronicle of Higher Education. 39 (1993): A30–38. January 6.Google Scholar
Marshall, Eliot. “George Brown Cuts Into Academic Pork.” Science. 258 (1992):22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Carolyn J. “Critics Within and Without Academe Assail Professors at Research Universities.” Chronicle of Higher Education. 39 (1992): A17–19. October 28.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Investing in Research: A Proposal to Strengthen the Agricultural, Food, and Environmental System. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer Policies for the 1990's. A Special Report of OTA's Assessment on Emerging Agricultural Technology: Issues for the 1990's. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment Publication OTA-F-448, March 1990.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. A New Technological Era for American Agriculture. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment Publication OTA-F-474, August 1992.Google Scholar
Penner, Rudolph G. “The Budget Deficit: Political Monster Born of Political Pets.” KPMG Peat Marwick Legislative and Policy Developments in Washington. May 1992.Google Scholar
Research Associates. Higher Education Price Indexes. Tenth Edition. Washington, D.C: Research Associates of Washington, 1990.Google Scholar
Richards, G.E. and Martha, David. “Scientist Involvement in Research Funding at the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.” Journal of Production Agriculture. 3 (1990): 602–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttan, Vernon W.Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Savage, James D. “Saints and Cardinals in Appropriations Committees and the Fight Against Distributive Politics.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 16 (1991): 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W. “Agricultural Research: Canada and Beyond.” In Economics of Agricultural Research in Canada, edited by Klein, K.K and Furtan, W.H.. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schweikhardt, David B.Financing Agricultural Research in a Federal System of Government: Optimal Cost-Sharing for State and National Investments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, 1989.Google Scholar
Schweikhardt, David B. and James T, Bonnen. “Financing Agricultural Research in the Presence of International Benefit Spillovers: The Need for Institutional Coordination and Innovation.” Invited paper presented at the XXI International Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, Tokyo, Japan, August 1991.Google Scholar
Schweikhardt, David B. and John F, Whims. “Trends and Issues in Agricultural Research Funding at the State Agricultural Experiment Stations.” Staff paper 92-89, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, December 1992.Google Scholar
Stiles, William A. Jr. “Current and Emerging National Issues Relevant to Agricultural Research Funding.” in Emerging Priorities for Agricultural Research in the 1990's. Proceedings and Minutes of the Thirty-seventh annual meeting of the Agricultural Research Institute, Washington, D.C, October 1988.Google Scholar
Sykes, Charles J.Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education. Washington, D.C: Regnery Gateway, 1988.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, H.A. “Opportunities for Public Policy Education in the Extension Initiatives.” In Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies-1989. Chicago: Farm Foundation, 1989.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar