Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:30:41.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Stochastic Simulation Analysis of a Small-Scale Catfish Processing Plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

William Branch  and
Daniel S. Tilley
William Branch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University
Daniel S. Tilley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stochastic simulation was used to analyze revenues and costs for a small-scale catfish processing plant under various combinations of operating capacity utilization and price paid for live fish. The probability for a positive level of daily net income ranged from 11 to 100 percent depending on the price paid for live fish and level of operating capacity utilized. Daily average total cost per pound of live fish processed changed by 2.10 percent given a 10 percent change in live fish processed. Short-term cyclical patterns in revenues and costs suggest a need for financial planning to provide for possible year-end revenue shortfalls.

Keywords

stochastic simulationcatfish processing
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , December 1992 , pp. 183 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ande, John M. “Incorporating Risk in Production Analysis,” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 65.5(1983): 1099–1106.Google Scholar
@ RISK-A Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-infor Lotus 1-2-3. Newfield, NY: Palisade Corporation, 1988.Google Scholar
Branch, William. A Simultaneous Equations Model and Analysis of the U.S. Catfish Marketing System. Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma Slate University, 1991.Google Scholar
Branch, William, and Tilley, Daniel S.. Oklahoma Net-Pen Catfish Production Systems: Estimated Production Levels and Costs. Agr. Exp. Sta. Research Report P-912, Oklahoma State University, 1990.Google Scholar
Cook, Thomas M., and Russell, Robert A.. Introduction to Management Science, 3rd ed. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1985.Google Scholar
Fuller, Marty J., and Dillard, James G.. Cost-size Relationships in the Processing of Farm-raised Catfish in the Delta of Mississippi. Miss. Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta. Bulletin 930, Mississippi State University, 1984.Google Scholar
Fuller, Marty J., Keenum, Mark E., Carter, Warren W. III and Waldrop, John E.. A Cost Analysis of Fingerling Size and Stocking Date in the Production of Channel Catfish for Food. Miss Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta. Agr. Econ. Res. Rpt, No. 178, Mississippi State University, 1988.Google Scholar
Garrard, Anthony B.An Economic Analysis of Small-Scale Processing For Farm-Raised Catfish in Mississippi. Master's thesis, Mississippi State University, 1987.Google Scholar
Garrard, Anthony B., Bumey, Jerry M., Keenum, Mark E. and Waldrop, John E.. Effect of Pond Size on Cost of Producing Farm-Raised Catfish in the Delta Area of Mississippi, Miss. Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta., Information Bull. No. 172, Mississippi State University, 1990.Google Scholar
Goldberger, Arthur SEconometric Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1964.Google Scholar
Keenum, Mark E., and Waldrop, John E.. Cash Flow Analysis of Farm-Raised Catfish Production in Mississippi. Miss. Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta. Agr. Econ. Tech. Pub. No. 73, Mississippi State University, 1988aGoogle Scholar
Keenum, Mark E., and Waldrop, John E.. Economic Analysis of Farm-Raised Catfish Production in Mississippi. Miss. Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta. Tech. Pub. No. 155, Mississippi State University, 1988bGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, Henry, Sindelar, Scott, Wineholt, David and Hatch, Upton. “Processor Demand and Price-Markup Functions for Catfish: A Disaggregated Analysis with Implications for the Off-Flavor Problem.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 20.2(1988): 81–91.Google Scholar
Lovell, R.T., Mustin, Walter G., and Jensen, John W.. Design of Small-Scale Catfish Processing Plants in Alabama. Ala. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circular 255, Auburn University, 1981.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Scott, Conner, J. Richard, and Waldrop, John E.. Survey of Commercial Catfish Processors — Structural and Operational Characteristics and Procurement and Marketing Practices. Mississippi Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta., AEC Res. Rpt. No. 130, Mississippi State University, 1981a.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Scott, Conner, J. Richard, and Waldrop, John E.. Survey of Commercial Catfish Producers—Current Production and Marketing Practices and Economic Implications. Miss. Agr. & Forestry Exp. Sta., AEC Res. Rpt. No. 129, Mississippi State University, 1981bGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S.S., and Wilk, M.B.. “An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples).“ Biometrika, 52(1965): 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Catfish Journal. Jackson, MS: Catfish Farmers of America, Various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Aquaculture Situation and Outlook Report. Washington, DC: USDA ERS. Various issues.Google Scholar