Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:22:50.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial Price Analysis Incorporating Rate of Trade: Methods and Application to United States–China Soybean Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Shengfei Han
Affiliation:
Department of International Business and Economics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Catherine A. Durham
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Portland, Oregon

Abstract

A regime-switching model for analysis of market integration has been developed that incorporates rate of trade information. An application of the methods to United States–China soybean trade demonstrates that the extended trade information allows better interpretation of market conditions. While the empirical results show that China's reform efforts since mid 1990s toward an open market have greatly improved United States–China soybean markets integration, about 40% of nontransitional disequilibrium occurrences likely indicate infrastructural limits such as the lack of information availability and limited competition. The United States–China price linkage is observed to be closer after China's World Trade Organization membership. The link has also been found relatively slack during the South American soybean harvest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baffes, J.Some Further Evidence on the Law of One Price: The Law of One Price Still Holds.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):126473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, C.B., and Li, J.R.Distinguishing Between Equilibrium and Integration in Spatial Price Analysis.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(2002):292307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauich, B.Transfer Costs, Spatial Arbitrage, and Testing for Food Market Integration.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):477–87.Google Scholar
Blank, S.C., Carter, C.A., and Schmiesing, B.Current Issues, Approaches, and Empirical Findings, Futures and Options Markets, Chapter 14. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
Branson, A. Personal E-mail Communication. Agriculture Specialist, Agricultural Affairs Office, United States Embassy, Beijing, October 2004.Google Scholar
Dhrymes, P.J.On the Strong Consistency of Estimators for Certain Distributed Lag Models with Auto-correlated Errors.International Economic Review 12(1971):329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, R.A Proof of the Consistency of Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Non-Linear Regression Models with Auto-Correlated Errors.Econometrica 48,4(1980):853–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A.H.W.Muthuswamy, J., and Webb, R.I.Arbitrage, Cointegration, and the Joint Dynamics of Prices across Discrete Commodity Futures Auctions.Journal of Futures Markets 19(1999):799815.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNew, K., and Fackler, PL.Testing Market Equilibrium: Is Co-Integration Informative?Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22,2(1997):197207.Google Scholar
Meyer, P., and Rameker, K. Personal Communication. Portland, Oregon, 2001.Google Scholar
Michael, P., Nobay, A.R., and Peel, D.A.Purchasing Power Parity Yet Again: Evidence from Spatially Separated Commodity Markets.Journal of International Money and Finance 13,6(1994):737–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, A., Jin, H., Rozelle, S., and Huang, J.Market Emergence and Transition: Arbitrage, Transaction Costs, and Autarky in China's Grain Market.American Journal of Agricultural Economies 84,1(2002):6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, R.J., Kling, CL., and Carman, H.F.Market Integration, Efficiency of Arbitrage, and Imperfect Competition: Methodology and Application to US Celery.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73,3(1991):568–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shyy, G., and Butcher, B.Price Equilibrium and Transmission in a Controlled Economy: A Case Study of the Metal Exchange in China.Journal of Futures Markets 14,8(1994):877–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, W. Personal communication. Corvallis, Oregon, 2001.Google Scholar
Tostäo, E., and Brorsen, W.Spatial Price Efficiency in Mozambique's Post-Reform Maize Markets.Agricultural Economics 33,2(2005):205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture-Foreign Agricultural Service. China, People's Republic of, Oilseeds and Products Annual, Part 1. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2001. Internet site: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200103/65679919.pdf (Accessed September 2009).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture-Foreign Agricultural Service. China: People's Republic of, Oilseeds and Products Annual, Part 1. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2005 and various years. Internet site: http://www.fas.usda.gov/scriptsw/AttacheRep/legacy.asp (Accessed September 2009).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture-Foreign Agricultural Service. Oilseeds World Markets and Trade-December. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2006 and earlier years. Internet site: http://www.fas.usda. gov/oilseeds_arc.asp (Accessed September 2009).Google Scholar
Yu, CAnalysis on China's Soybean Price Co-integration.International Business Journal of the University of International Business and Economics 5(2007):4448 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Yu, W., and Huang, J.On the Reform of Chinese Grain Markets: An Co-Integration Analysis of the Chinese Rice Markets.Economic Research Journal 3(1998):5057.Google Scholar
Zanias, G.P.Testing for Integration in European Community Agricultural Product Markets.Journal of Agricultural Economics 44,3(1993):418–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar