Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:43:45.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural Housing Needs and Barriers: The Case of Central Appalachia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Brady J. Deaton  and
Charles E. Hanrahan
Brady J. Deaton
Affiliation:
The University of Tennessee
Charles E. Hanrahan
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nation's housing needs are a subject of major public concern – and rightfully so. The 1970 Census revealed 2.5 million substandard houses in nonmetropolitan areas inhabited by almost 13 million people. Two earlier major government reports presented a picture of unfulfilled housing needs, and the pervasive social, economic, political and institutional obstacles to meeting these needs.

Unfortunately, despite the pressing nature of substandard housing illuminated in these reports, few researchers have responded with serious analysis of the problem. Only passing attention to housing needs was given by the President's Poverty Commission, even though the quality of housing is widely recognized as a key indicator of economic development and the quality of living.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , July 1973 , pp. 59 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research effort was supported jointly by the Commission on Religion in Appalachia, Knoxville, Tennessee, and the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, and was conducted under the supervision of Dr. Kurt R. Anschel, Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky.

References

[1]Appalachian Regional Commission, Appalachia: A Journal of the Appalachian Regional Commission, Oct. 1967.Google Scholar
[2]Appalachian Regional Commission, Appalachia: A Journal of the Appalachian Regional Commission, Vol. 4, No. 7 (May-June, 1971).Google Scholar
[3]Appalachian Regional Commission, Housing, Staff Report No. 1, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[4]Checchi and Co., Capital Resources in the Central Appalachian Region, Washington, D.C., Aug. 1969.Google Scholar
[5]Daberkow, Stan, “Economic Factors Influencing the Level of Economic Development of Multicounty Areas,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, July, 1972.Google Scholar
[6]Dolbeare, Cushing N., Federal Tax Rip-Offs: Housing Subsidies for the Rich, Rural Housing Alliance, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1972.Google Scholar
[7]Douglas, Paul, et. al., Building the American City: Report of National Commission on Urban Problems to the Congress and to the President of the United States, Washington: U.S. Gov. Print. Office, 1968.Google Scholar
[8]Executive Office of the President, Office of Economic Opportunity, Community Profiles (by county), Washington, D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
[9]Executive Office of the President, Office of Economic Opportunity, Federal Outlays (by states), 1968, 1969, 1970, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[10]Fried, Joseph P., Housing Crisis, U.S.A., New York: Praeger Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
[11]Fuguitt, Glenn V., “Some Characteristics of Villages in Rural America,” Rural Poverty in the United States, a report by the President's National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty, Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C., May, 1968.Google Scholar
[12]Gish, Pat, Statement Before the Senate Subcommittee on Employment, Manpower and Poverty, April 28, 1971.Google Scholar
[13]Herr, William McD., “Credit and Farm Policy,” Rural Poverty in the United States, a report by the President's National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty, Washington: U.S. Gov. Print. Office, May, 1968.Google Scholar
[14]Joint Economic Committee, The Economics of Federal Subsidy Programs: A Compendium of Papers, Part IV, Housing Subsidies, Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
[15]Kaiser, Edgar, et. al., A Decent Home: The Report of the President's Committee on Urban Housing, Washington: U.S. Gov. Print. Office, 1969.Google Scholar
[16]Model City Advisory Council, Pikeville, Kentucky, Neighborhood Analysis, 1968, Pikeville, Kentucky, 1968.Google Scholar
[17]Rural Housing Alliance, Low-Income Housing Programs for Rural America, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1971.Google Scholar
[18]United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census of Housing (1960 and 1970), Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[19]United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census Census of Population (1970), Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[20]Urban America, Inc., Kentucky Housing Fund, report to the Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, D.C., April, 1968.Google Scholar
[21]United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, West Virginia Housing Development Fund, report to the Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, D.C., April, 1968.Google Scholar
[22]Wilpers, John, “Broken Promises and Broken Lives,” Government Executive, Vol. 4, No. 9, Sept. 1972.Google Scholar
[23]Winn, William, “Red Tape: FmHA is More Sensitive to Congress Than to Poor,” South Today: Digest of Southern Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 9, May, 1971.Google Scholar