Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:11:58.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Risk Programming Analysis of Cattle Procurement by Beef Packers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ronald Raikes ,
Gail M. Sieck  and
Katherine S. Miller
Ronald Raikes
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Gail M. Sieck
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Katherine S. Miller
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Producers and processors of many agricultural commodities can choose from among several coordination arrangements including spot-market exchange, contractual arrangements, and vertical integration. Firm decisions about coordination arrangements are important because they affect the success or even the survival of the firm and also cause broader impacts. The choice of marketing arrangements will influence a firm's profitability through prices received or paid, quality premiums or discounts, marketing costs incurred, exposure to production or price risk, and perhaps capital requirements. These firm decisions may have repercussions throughout the industry. For example, decisions by processing firms to shift from spot purchases to contract purchases may effectively foreclose the opportunity for producers to make spot sales. Decisions by processors to vertically integrate into production may force specialized producers out of business by limiting their marketing alternatives. Firm decision models focusing on choices among coordination arrangements should be helpful for prescribing and predicting firm behavior, predicting trends in relative importance of alternative arrangements, and evaluating policies (e.g., laws prohibiting processor ownership of production facilities) that are designed to influence these trends.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , December 1978 , pp. 43 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Araji, A. A. “The Effect of Vertical Integration on the Production Efficiency of Beef Cattle Operations,” American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, Volume 58, 1976, pp. 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barry, P. J. and Baker, C. B.. “Reservation Prices on Credit Use: A Measure of Response to Uncertainty,” American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, Volume 53, 1971, pp. 222–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Barry, P. J. and Willmann, D. R.. “A Risk-Programming Analysis of Forward Contracting with Credit Constraints,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, 1976, pp. 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Boehlje, M. and Trede, L.. “Beef Cattle Feeding in Iowa 1974: Evaluation of Feedlot Systems,” PM 602, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University, Ames, 1974.Google Scholar
[5]Borch, K. “A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves,” Review of Economic Studies, Volume 36, 1969, pp. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cothern, J., Peard, R. M., and Weeks, J. L.. “Economies of Scale in Beef Slaughtering: Northern California, 1976,” unpublished, 1977.Google Scholar
[7]Fishburn, P. C. “Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns,” American Economic Review, Volume 67, 1977, pp. 116–126.Google Scholar
[8]Greenhut, M. L. and Ohta, H.. “Related Market Conditions and Interindustrial Mergers,” American Economic Review, Volume 66, 1976, pp. 267–277.Google Scholar
[9]Hanoch, G. and Levy, H.. “The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk,” Review of Economic Studies Volume 36, 1969, pp. 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Iowa Cooperative Extension Service. “Estimated Returns from Cattle Feeding in Iowa Under Two Alternate Feeding Programs,” M-1152, Iowa State University, Ames, 1974.Google Scholar
[11]Markowitz, H. “Portfolio Selection,” Journal of Finance, Volume 7, 1952, pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
[12]Mighell, R. L. and Jones, L. A.. “Vertical Coordination in Agriculture,” Agricultural Economics Report No. 19, U.S.D.A., E.R.S., 1963.Google Scholar
[13]Raikes, R., Skadberg, J. M., and Schaefer, H.. “Slaughter Cattle Basis Information for Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, and Nebraska Feeders,” Iowa Cooperative Extension Service, M-1168, 1974.Google Scholar
[14]Snyder, J. C. and Candler, W.. “A Normative Analysis of the Value of Quality, Regularity, and Volume in Hog Marketing,” Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin SB 12, August 1973.Google Scholar
[15]Trifon, R. “Guides for Speculation About the Vertical Integration of Agriculture with Allied Industries,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 41, 1959, pp. 734–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]U.S.D.A., Agricultural Marketing Service. Livestock, Meat, and Wool Market News, Washington, D.C., Volumes 36-44.Google Scholar
[17]Whitson, R. E., Barry, P. J., and Lacewell, R. D.. “Vertical Integration for Risk Management: An Application to a Cattle Ranch,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 8, 1976, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
[18]Williamson, O. E. “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations,” American Economic Review, Volume 61, 1971, pp. 112–123.Google Scholar