Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:35:49.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Profitability and Resource Allocation Among Cotton and Peanuts When Considering Planting and Harvest Timeliness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

Timothy A. Meeks
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Archie Flanders
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
W. Don Shurley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Fred C. White
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Lewell F. Gunter
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA

Abstract

Harvest timeliness is a continual problem in the rotation of cotton and peanuts. Efficient allocation of land and labor resources during production of cotton and peanuts requires decisions be made on allocating resources throughout the growing season. Of particular concern is efficient allocation during planting and harvesting. Through economic analysis and linear programming optimization, planting and harvesting timeliness issues are addressed and compared with prevailing practices. Results for a representative farm indicate that cotton planting should increase during the early period of the planting season as compared with current practice, and most cotton should be harvested before peanut harvest begins.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, S., Todd, J., Culbreath, A., Baldwin, J., Beasley, J., Kemerait, B., and Pappu, H.. “Tomato Spotted Wilt of Peanut–Identifying & Avoiding High Risk Situations.” Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, Extension Bulletin 1165, Revised February 2001.Google Scholar
Georgia Agricultural Statistics Service (GASS). Georgia Weather and Crops Bulletin. Athens, GA, all issues 1997-2001.Google Scholar
Givan, W., Shurley, D., and Smith, N.. Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis–2002. Athens, GA: College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, AGECON94-010-S, revised November 2001.Google Scholar
Kemerait, R.C., Seebold, K.W. Jr., McDaniel, R.G., and Spaid, D.G.. “Management of Rhizoctonia Seedling Blight in Georgia with Fungicides and Variable Plant Populations.” Cotton Research–Extension Report 2002. pp. 293–99. Athens, GA: College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, April 2003.Google Scholar
Larson, J.A., Mapp, H.P., Verhalen, L.M., and Banks, J.C.. “Adapting a Cotton Model for Decision Analyses: Yield-Response Evaluation.Agricultural Systems 50(1996): 145–67.10.1016/0308-521X(95)00004-OGoogle Scholar
Luke, A., Fletcher, S., Martin, R., Todd, J., Shurley, D., Culbreath, A., Gorbet, D., Baldwin, J., and Brown, S.. “Economic Analysis of Components Comprising the University of Georgia Tomato Spotted Wilt Risk Index for Peanuts.” Athens, GA: College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, Center Publication 02-99-001, February 1999.Google Scholar
Micinski, S., Colyer, P.D., Nguyen, K.T., and Koonce, K.L.. “Effects of Planting Dates and Early-Season Pest Control on Yield in Cotton.” Journal of Production Agriculture 3,4(October/De-cember 1990):597602.10.2134/jpa1990.0597Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). U.S. and State Level Data for: Crop Progress. Internet site: www.nass.usda.gov:81/ipedb/progress.htm (Accessed January 29, 2004).Google Scholar
National Cotton Council (NCC). Cotton Seedling Diseases Program. Internet site: www.cotton.org/tech/pest/seedling/soil.cfm (Accessed January 29, 2004).Google Scholar
National Data Climatic Center. “Climate Resources.” Internet site: lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/climateresources.htm (Accessed January 28, 2004).Google Scholar
Parvin, D.W. Jr.The Importance of Harvest Initiation Date.” Proceedings–Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferences, pp. 471–74, Las Vegas, NV: National Cotton Council, 1990.Google Scholar
Shurley, W.D. Enterprise Costs and Return Budget Estimates for Conventional and Transgenic Cotton–Georgia. Tifton, GA: Monsanto, Inc. (Special Report), August 2000.Google Scholar
Shurley, W.D. 2002 Farm Bill Provisions and Impacts. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural and Applied Economics, Internet site: www.ces. uga.edu/Agriculture/agecon/fbill/fbillpres.htm (Accessed May 15, 2002).Google Scholar
Shurley, W.D., and Bednarz, C.W.. “Evidence of Defoliation and Harvest Timeliness Effects on Yield, Grade, and Profit: the Case of Cotton in Georgia.” pp. 285–87. Proceedings–Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX: National Cotton Council, 2000.Google Scholar
Shurley, W.D., Bednarz, C.W.. “Impact of Defoliation and Harvest Time liness on Cotton Profits: A Summary of Two Years of Research.” Cotton Research–Extension Report 2000. p. 22, Athens, GA: College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, 2001.Google Scholar
Shurley, W.D., and Deal, D.E.. “Predicting Cotton Yield in Georgia Using Crop Progress and Conditions Data.” Proceedings–Beltwide Cotton Conferences, pp. 482–84, New Orleans, LA: National Cotton Council, 1993.Google Scholar
Smith, N. New Peanut Program Provisions. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2002. Internet site: www.ces.uga.edu/Agriculture/agecon/fbill/fbillpres.htm (Accessed May 15, 2002).Google Scholar