Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:35:01.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Price Transmission, Threshold Behavior, and Asymmetric Adjustment in the U.S. Pork Sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Barry K. Goodwin  and
Daniel C. Harper
Barry K. Goodwin*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University
Daniel C. Harper
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University
*
P.O. Box 8109, Raleigh, NC 27695, (919) 515-4547, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The US pork sector has experienced many significant structural changes in recent years. Such changes may have influenced price dynamics and transmission of shocks through marketing channels. We investigate linkages among farm, wholesale, and retail markets using weekly price data for the period covering 1987 through 1998. Our analysis uses a threshold cointegration model that permits asymmetric adjustment to positive and negative price shocks. Our results reveal important asymmetries. Our results are consistent with existing literature which has determined that price adjustment patterns are unidirectional and that information tends to flow from farm, to wholesale, to retail markets.

Keywords

asymmetric price transmissionvertical price transmissionerror correctionthresholdspork markets
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 543 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, D.V. and Brorsen, B.W.. “Price Asymmetry in Spatial Fed Cattle Markets.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14(1989):246–252.Google Scholar
Balke, N.S. and Fomby, T.B.. “Threshold Cointegration.” International Economic Review 38(1997):627–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M.S. and Brorsen, B.W.. “Dynamic Relationship of Weekly Prices in the United States Beef and Pork Marketing Channels.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 33(1985):331–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M.S. and Brorsen, B.W.. “Price Asymmetry in the U.S. Pork Marketing Channel.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(1988):103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J., “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55(1987):251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B.K. and Grennes, T.J.. “Tsarist Russia and the World Wheat Market.” Explorations in Economic History 35(1998):405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B.K. and Holt, M.T.. “Asymmetric Adjustment and Price Transmission in the U.S. Beef Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):630–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, W.F. “Price Transmission Asymmetry in Pork and Beef Markets.” Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 42(1990):21–30.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.D.Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. “Inference in TAR Models.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 2(April 1997):1–14.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. and Juselius, K.. CATS in RATS—User's Manual. Evanston, Illinois: Estima, 1995.Google Scholar
Houck, J.P. “An Approach to Specifying and Estimating Non-Reversible Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(1977):570–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W. and Forker, O.D.. “Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(1987):285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Pork Producers Council. 1998-99 Pork Facts. Des Moines, Iowa, 1999.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Taylor, A.M.. “Nonlinear Aspects of Goods-Market Arbitrage and Adjustment; Heckscher's Commodity Points Revisited.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 11(1997):441–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, S.M. “A Nonlinear Approach to US GNP.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 10(1995):109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T.C. “Price Linkages Between Wholesale and Retail Pork Cuts.” Agribusiness 4(June-July 1988):359–369.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siklos, P.L. and Granger, C.W.J.. “Regime Sensitive Cointegration: With an Application to Interest Rate Parity.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 1(1997):(online).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsay, R.S. “Testing and Modeling Threshold Autoregressive Processes.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(1989):231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Cramon-Taubadel, S. “Estimating Asymmetric Price Transmission with the Error Correction Representation: An Application to the German Pork Market.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 25(1998):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R.W. “Asymmetry in Retail, Wholesale, and Shipping Point Prices for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(1982):205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolffram, R. “Positivisitic Measures of Aggregate Supply Elasticities—Some New Approaches— Some Critical Notes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(1971):356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar