Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:48:11.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Poverty of Applied Policy Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

William G. Boggess
William G. Boggess*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Fconomics, Oregon Slate University, Corvallis (formerly professor, Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘We always plan too much and think too little. We resent a call to thinking and hate unfamiliar argument that does not tally with what we already believe or would like to believe.’

– Joseph Schumpeter, (1947, pg. xi)

My objective today is to put forth a call for each of you to rethink how we do applied policy analysis. I plan to justify the need for this rethinking using a variety of arguments. Some of my arguments will be familiar to most if not all of you, others may be unfamiliar to most if not all. I claim no originality for the basic theoretical arguments, they all appear in the literature. What 1 hope you find to be original and useful is the synthesis of these arguments. Furthermore, though in places 1 will point out the need for additional theoretical work, my primary goal is to convince practicing agricultural policy analysts to become more comprehensive in their analyses. In the grand tradition of presidential addresses, my remarks cover a rather broad range of issues at the expense of depth on any one issue. Nevertheless, I hope that my remarks will stimulate discussion and thought about how we as agricultural economists do applied policy analysis.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. W., Arrow, K. J., and Pines, D. (Editors), 1988. “The Economy as an Evolving Complex System: A Proceedings in the Sciences of Complexity.” Addison-Wesley Company, Redding, MA, 336 pp.Google Scholar
Arthur, B. “Positive Feedback in the Economy.” Scientific American, 262:92–99, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. “Principles of Morals and Legislation.” London: Doubleday, 1791.Google Scholar
Boggess, W.G. “A Case Study of Nutrient Management for Florida Dairies.” Proceedings of SRIEG-10 meeting. Raleigh, NC, October 1993.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. W. “The Language of Loss: Or How to Paralyze Policy to Protect the Status Quo.” Choices, pp. 31–34, Third Quarter, 1994.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. W. “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1990):86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., and Tullock, G., eds. “Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. “Individual Choice in Voting and the Market”. Journal of Political Economy, 62, pp. 334–43, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. N. “A Pluralistic, Pragmatic and Evolutionary Approach to Natural Resource Management.” Forest Ecology and Management, 56(1993):279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavas, Jean-Paul. “Equity Considerations in Economic and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994): 1022–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, Mick and Charles Perrings. “Towards an Ecological Economics of Sustainability.” Ecological Economics. 6:7–32 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. “The Entropy Law and the Economic Process.” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.Google Scholar
Hagy, J. R. “Watergate.” Florida Trend Magazine, pp.32–37, March 1993.Google Scholar
Holling, C.S. “Cross-scale Morphology, Geometry and Dynamics of Ecosystems.” Ecological Monographs, 62(5):447–502, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. and Palmer, K.. “Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 95-03, October 1994.Google Scholar
Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L., and Schmitz, A.. “Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy.” Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.” American Economic Review, 64(Jun 1974): 1045–67.Google Scholar
Landeil Mills Commodities Studies, Inc. Suga?- and AFCS Production Costs: The Competitive Position of the U.S. Industry. London, August 1991.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J.O. and Mody, A.. “Stimulating Innovation and the International Diffusion of Environmentally Responsive Technology: The Role of Expenditures and Institutions.” Mimeo, 1993.Google Scholar
Lee, D. R. “Rent-Seeking and Its Implications for Pollution Taxation.” The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. Edited by Rowley, C.K, Tollison, R. D. and Tullock, G., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 353–370, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, F. S. “Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation.” The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking, edited by Rowley, C.K, Tollison, R. D. and Tullock, G., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 179–196, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, D. C. “Public Choices II.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1989.Google Scholar
Nozick, R.Anarchy State and Utopia, Basil Books, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press. New Haven. 1982.Google Scholar
Pagano, A. P., Boggess, W. G., Moss, C. B. and Holt, John. “Technology Adoption Decision Under Irreversibility and Uncertainty: An Ex Ante Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Pazner, E.A. and Schmeidler, D.. “Pifalls in the Theory of Justice”. Journal of Economic Theory, 14(April 1977):458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Michael E. and Van Der Linde, C.. “Towards a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Harvard Business School, November 1993.Google Scholar
Rauch, Jonathan. Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government. Times Books. New York. 1994.Google Scholar
Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. “Foundations of Economic Analysis.” Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. “Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy.” Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, 1947.Google Scholar
Smith, K. R. “Science and Social Advocacy: A Dilemma for Policy Analysts.” Choices, pp. 19–24, First Quarter, 1994.Google ScholarPubMed
Sonstelie, J. C. and Portney, P. R.. “Truth or Consequences: Cost Revelation and Regulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 2, No. 2, 280–295, 1993.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics, 2:3–21, 1971.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.Essays on Schumpeterian Growth Theory: Trustified Capitalism and Non-Tournament Technology Competition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1993.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. “Rents and Rent-Seeking.” The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking, edited by Rowley, C.K, Tollison, R. D. and Tullock, G., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 51–62, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science, Vol. 211, January 1981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed