Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:42:22.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Economy of Right-to-Farm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Adesoji O. Adelaja  and
Keith Friedman
Adesoji O. Adelaja
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Keith Friedman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the motivations for local right-to-farm protection ordinances by estimating a logit model relating the adoption of these ordinances to various political, economic and demographic factors previously found to affect the likelihood of passage of farmland preservation policies. Results suggest that the probability of adopting right-to-farm policies increases with the size and political clout of the farm public and with incentives to promote right-to-farm. Adoption is not enhanced by environmental concerns, nor by factors known to encourage adoption of farmland preservation policies. These findings raise serious concerns about the long-run viability of protections afforded agriculture in urbanizing areas.

Keywords

nuisance litigationopen spacepolitical economyrestrictive ordinancesright-to-farm
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 1999 , pp. 565 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaja, A.O., Brooks, F.J.A., Heinrich, H.H., Hayes, P.E., and K. Friedman, . The Right-to-Farm in New Jersey: A Legal, Institutional and Social Analysis. The Ecopolicy Center for Agricultural, Environmental and Resource Issues, Cook College/NJAES, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. New Brunswick, NJ. Ecopolicy Center Report #AERDI94-4-95-1, 1996.Google Scholar
Adelaja, A.O., Schilling, Brian J. and Menzo, Julia E.. Changing New Jersey's Farmland Assessment Eligibility Requirement: Impacts on Land Use, Open Space and Municipal Finance, Volume I.“ The Ecopolicy Center Report No. AER-DI94-2-97-1 and NJAES publication No. SR-02529-96-4, New Brunswick, 1997.Google Scholar
Baldassare, M.The Growth Dilemma: Residents' View and Local Population Change in the United States. Berkley: University of California Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Government Research and Department of Government Services, New Jersey Legislative District Data Book: 1985. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, 1985.Google Scholar
Centner, T.J. and Bergstrom, J.C.. Agricultural Nuisances and the Georgia Right-to-Farm Law. The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations. College of Agriculture, The University of Georgia. Research Report 547, 1988.Google Scholar
Division of Taxation, State of New Jersey. “Twenty-Fourth Report of Data from FA-1 Forms for 1992 Tax Year. Farmland Assessment Act of 1964:” Chapter 48, Laws of 1964. Trenton, NJ., 1993.Google Scholar
Dye, T.R.Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1966.Google Scholar
Bloustein, Edward J. School of Planning & Public Policy, New Jersey Legislative District Data Book: 1994. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, 1995.Google Scholar
Fischel, W.A. “The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study.” Land Economics 58 (1982):236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, B.J.The Environmental Protection Hustle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Furuseth, O.J. “Local Farmland Conservation Programmes in the U.S.: A Study of California Counties.” Applied Geography 5 (1985a):211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuseth, O.J. “Influences on County Farmland Protection Efforts in California: A Discriminant Analysis.” The Professional Geographer 37 (1985b):443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, B.D. “The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(1977): 1027–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, N.D.A Livestock Producer's Legal Guide To: Nuisance, Land Use Control, and Environmental Law. Drake University Agricultural Law Center, Des Moines, Iowa, 1992a.Google Scholar
Hamilton, N.D. “Right-to-Farm Laws Revisited: Judicial Consideration of Agricultural Nuisance Protections.” Journal of Agricultural Taxation & Law 14(1992b): 195–228.Google Scholar
Hamilton, N.D. and Andrews, G.. Employing the “Sound Agricultural Practices” Approach to Providing Right to Farm Nuisance Protections to Agriculture. Drake University Law School, Agricultural Law Center, White Paper 93–2, Des Moines, Iowa, 1993.Google Scholar
Hand, J.P. “Right-to-Farm Laws: Breaking New Ground in the Preservation of Farmland.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 45 (1984): 289–350.Google Scholar
Kline, J. and D. Wichelns, . “Using Referendum Data to Characterize Public Support for Purchasing Development Rights to Farmland.” Land Economics 70 (1994):223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapping, M.B. and Leutwiler, N.R.. “Agriculture in Conflict: Right-to-Farm Laws and the Peri-Urban Milieu for Farming.” In Sustaining Agriculture Near Cities, Lockeretz, W. (ed), Soil and Water Conservation Society, 1987.Google Scholar
Lapping, M.B., Penfold, G.E., and S. MacPherson, . “Right-To-Farm Laws: Do They Resolve Land Use Conflict?” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38(1983):465–467.Google Scholar
Liao, T.F.Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisansky, J. “Farming in an Urbanizing Environment: Agricultural Land Use Conflicts and Right To Farm.” Human Organization 45 (1986):363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J.R. “Notes on the Growth Machine: Toward a Comparative Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology 82(1976):349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Jersey Department of Agriculture. New Jersey Agriculture: 1995. Trenton, New Jersey, 1996.Google Scholar
Hornor, E.R. (ed). The New Jersey Municipal Data Book: 1992–93 Edition. Information Publications. Palo Alto, California, 1992.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L.. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Prosser, W.Handbook of the Law of Torts, 4th edition, 1971.Google Scholar
Protash, W. and M. Baldassare, . “Growth Policies and Community Status: A Test and Modification of Logan's Theory.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 18(1983):397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, N.Land Use and the Legislatures: The Politics of State Innovation. The Urban Institute. Washington, DC, 1976.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, I.Regionalism in American Politics. Indianapolis, Indiana, Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. Jr. “Defining and Protecting the Right to Farm.” Zoning and Planning Law Report 5 (September 1982):57–63.Google Scholar
Urban Land Institute. “The Agricultural Land Preservation Issue: Recommendations for Balancing Urban and Agricultural Land Needs” (Urban Land Institute policy statement). Urban Land 41(1982): 18–26.Google Scholar