Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:19:13.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pesticide Tax, Cropping Patterns, and Water Quality in South Central Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

C. Richard Shumway  and
Rayanne R. Chesser
C. Richard Shumway
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Rayanne R. Chesser
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of an ad valorem pesticide tax on cropping patterns and pesticide use was examined in the South Central Texas Crop Reporting District. Output supply equations were econometrically estimated and used in the simulation. A 25 percent tax on pesticide was estimated to have major impacts on cropping patterns and on pesticide use. Assuming other input and output prices were unaffected, the supply of one important crop would fall by more than half. Demand for some of the highly soluble and persistent pesticides, which present the greatest threat to groundwater quality, would also decrease substantially (some as much as 50 percent).

Keywords

cropsdual modelpesticidessupplywater quality
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , July 1994 , pp. 224 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batie, S.S. “Agriculture as the Problem: The Case of Groundwater Contamination.” CHOICES 3 No. 3, (1988):4–7.Google Scholar
Beach, E. D., and Carlson, G. A.. “A Hedonic Analysis of Herbicides: Do User Safety and Water Quality Matter?” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993):612–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briskin, J. “Update on EPA's National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water.” pp. 7–20 in Solutions to Non-Point Source Pollution (ed. Jensen, Rie), Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M University, December 1990.Google Scholar
Carlson, G. A., and Shui, S.. “Estimating Pesticide Demand Functions: Quantity-Quality Tradeoffs and Farm Program Effects.” Working Paper, North Carolina State University, 1991.Google Scholar
Carson, R.Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1962.Google Scholar
Chicago Board of Trade. Statistical Annual: Chicago Board of Trade, annual series, 1939–1982.Google Scholar
Cornforth, G.C. Texas Agricultural Extension Service Management Specialist, District 10, Personal Communication, November 1992.Google Scholar
Crowder, B. M., Ribaudo, M. O., and Young, C. E.. Agriculture and Water Quality. USDA/ERS Agricultural Information Bulletin Number 548, August 1988.Google Scholar
Delvo, H. Personal Communication Based on EPA Data in June 8, 1993 ERS Staff Report, July 14, 1993.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. “Demand and Substitution of Agricultural Inputs in the Central Corn Belt States.” Working Paper, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, 1991.Google Scholar
Gerlow, A.R. Texas Agricultural Extension Service Management Specialist, District 11, Personal Communication, November 1992.Google Scholar
Gianessi, L.P. “Use of Selected Soluble Pesticides in Agricultural Crop Production in Three States.” Resources for the Future, Washington, February 1988.Google Scholar
Griffin, R.G. “A Review of Information Relating to Damages from Fertilizers and Pesticides” Unpublished Manuscript, Texas A&M University, 1990.Google Scholar
Houck, J. P., and Gallagher, P. W.. “The Price Responsiveness of U.S. Corn Yields.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):731–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, J. P., Abel, M. E., Ryan, M. E., Gallagher, P. W., Hoffman, R. G., and Penn, J. B.. Analyzing the Impact of Government Programs on Crop Acreage. USDA/ERS Technical Bulletin Number 1548, 1976.Google Scholar
Ito, S., Grant, W. R., and Rister, M. E.. “Impacts of Technology Adoption on the U.S. Rice Economy.” Texas A&M University Agricultural Economics Faculty Paper Series FP 92-6, November 1992.Google Scholar
Jones, J., and Hexem, R.W.. Cash Rents for Farms, Cropland, and Pasture, 1960-89. USDA/ERS Statistical Bulletin No. 813, October 1990.Google Scholar
Klein, A.J. “The National Alachlor Well Water Survey: A Brief Overview.” pp. 143–48 in Solutions to Non-Point Source Pollution (ed. Jensen, Rie), Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M University, December 1990.Google Scholar
Lau, L.J. “Testing and Imposing Monotonicity, Convexity and Quasi-Convexity Constraints.” pp. 409–53 in Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications (eds., Fuss, M. and McFadden, D.), Volume 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
Leathers, H. “Allocable Fixed Inputs as a Cause of Joint Production: A Cost Function Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73(1991): 1083–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, H. “Profit Maximization, Returns to Scale, Separability, and Measurement Error in State-Level Agricultural Technology.” Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, 1989.Google Scholar
Lim, H., Shumway, C. R., and Honeycutt, T.J.. “Disaggregated Output Supply and Pesticide Policy.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 15 (1993):233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, C.S. “Evaluating Alternative Methods of Including Government Policy Information for Multiproduct Supply Analysis.” Working paper, University of Georgia, 1991.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C.S. “Specification of Government Policy Variables.” Agricultural Economics Faculty Series No. 89-61, University of Georgia, 1989.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. S., and Williams, A.A.. “Multiproduct Production Choices and Pesticide Regulation in Georgia.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 24 No. 1 (1992): 135–44.Google Scholar
Miller, S. E., Capps, O., and Wells, G.J.. “Confidence Intervals for Elasticities and Flexibilities from Linear Equations.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 66(1984):392–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranowski, J.A. “The Demand for Agricultural Crop Chemicals Under Alternative Farm Program and Pollution Control Solutions.” Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1975.Google Scholar
Moschini, G. “Normal Inputs and Joint Production with Allocatable Fixed Factors.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71 (1989): 1021–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilsen, E. G., and Lee, L.K.. The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective. USDA/ERS Agricultural Economics Report No. 576, 1987.Google Scholar
Ornelas, F. “Functional Form Selection and Impact of Government-Supported Crops on Vegetable Supplies in Texas.” Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, 1991.Google Scholar
Osteen, C. D., and Szmedra, P.I.. Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends and Policy Issues. USDA/ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 622, 1989.Google Scholar
Pena, J.G. Texas Agricultural Extension Service Management Specialist, District 14, Personal Communication, November 1992.Google Scholar
Rister, M. E., Grant, W. R., Harper, J. K., Smith, E. G., and Stansel, J.W.. Impact of Government Farm Programs on Texas Rice Acreage. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station MP-1707, April 1990.Google Scholar
Romain, R.F.J. “A Commodity Specific Policy Simulation Model for U.S. Agriculture.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, 1983.Google Scholar
Rossi, N. “The Estimation of Product Supply and Input Demand by the Differential Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 66(1984):368–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shortle, J.S. and Dunn, J.W.. “The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 68(1986):668–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, C. R., and Alexander, W.P.. “Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70(1988): 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talpaz, H., Alexander, W. P., and Shumway, C.R.. “Estimation of Systems of Equations Subject to Curvature Constraints.” J. Stat. Comp, and Sim. 32(1989):201–14.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R., Penson, J. B., Smith, E. G., and Knutson, R.D.. “Economic Impacts of Chemical Use Reduction on the South.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 23 No. 1 (1991): 15–23.Google Scholar
TAEX-SCS-ASCS. “Seco Creek Water Quality Demonstration Project Annual Project Report Fiscal Year 1992”. Unpublished Manuscript. November 1992.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Extension Service. “TAEX Specialist Pesticide Use Survey,” College Station, March 1988.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Texas Crop Enterprise Budgets, 1991.Google Scholar
Texas Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Texas Field Crop Statistics, annual series, 1973–1985a.Google Scholar
Texas Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Texas Small Grains Statistics, annual series, 1973–1985b.Google Scholar
Texas Water Commission. “Groundwater Pollution Potential, Agricultural Sources.” Plate 2, January 1989a.Google Scholar
Texas Water Commission. Groundwater Quality of Texas — An Overview of Natural and Man-Affected Conditions. Report 89-01, March 1989b.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. House Committee on Public Works and Transportation. Contamination of Groundwater by Pesticides. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. 100th Congress (100-78), 2nd session, 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices, annual series.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics, annual series.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Field Crops Production, Disposition, and Value, annual series.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. State Farm Income and Balance Sheet Statistics, annual series.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “RTD Updates: Cropping Practices.” Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division, July 1993.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Census of Agriculture. 1978, 1982, 1987.Google Scholar
Villezca, P. A., and Shumway, C.R.. “Multiple-Output Production Modeled with Three Functional Forms.” J. Agr. and Res. Econ. 17 (1992a): 13–28.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “State-Level Output Supply and Input Demand Elasticities for Agricultural Commodities.” J. Agr. Econ. Res. 44 No. 1 (1992b):22–34.Google Scholar
Zellner, A. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 57(1962):348–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar