Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:26:42.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling the Effects of the Food Stamp Program on Participating Households' Purchases: An Empirical Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Chung L. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia College of Agriculture, Georgia Experiment Station, Experiment, Georgia
Stanley M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia College of Agriculture, Georgia Experiment Station, Experiment, Georgia
Robert Raunikar
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia College of Agriculture, Georgia Experiment Station, Experiment, Georgia

Extract

The present legal authority for the Food Stamp Program (FSP) is the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977. As adopted, the legislation includes a thorough overhaul of the FSP enacted into law in 1964. The FSP provides direct subsidies in the form of additional food dollars to low-income households to enhance the purchasing of nutritionally adequate diets. The most significant effect both on participating households and the food industry is the elimination of the purchase requirement whereby participants pay for food stamps. Under the new legislation, participants receive food stamps free of charge. The benefits received are roughly equivalent to the value of bonus stamps under the old program (Stucker and Boehm).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buse, R. C. and Salathe, L. E.Adult Equivalent Scales: An Alternative Approach.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):460–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, K. W.Welfare Benefits of the Food Stamp Program.S. Econ. J. 43(1976):86478.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A. S.Econometric Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1964.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J.Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.Econometrica 47(1979): 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, H. G.The Reasons Participants Drop Out of the Food Stamp Program: A Case Study of Its Implications.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 52(1970):387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. F. and Moffitt, R. A.The Uses of Tobit Analysis.Rev. Econ. Stat. 62(1980):31821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelhammer, R. and West, D. A.Food Stamp Participation Among Low-Income Household: Theo¬retical Considerations of the Impact on the Demand for Food.” 5. J. Agr. Econ. 7(1975):223–31.Google Scholar
Neenan, P. H. and Davis, C. G.Impacts of the Food Stamps Program on Low Income Household Food Consumption in Rural Florida.S. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1977):8997.Google Scholar
Reese, R. B., Feaster, I. G., and Perkins, G. B.Bonus Food Stamps and Cash Income Supplements. ERS, USDA, Res. Rept. 1034, Oct. 1974.Google Scholar
Rungeling, B. and Smith, L. H.Factors Affecting Food Stamp Nonparticipation in the Rural South. University of Mississippi, Center for Manpower Studies, Jan. 1975.Google Scholar
Salathe, L. E.Food Stamp Program Impacts on Household Food Purchases: Theoretical Considerations.Agr. Econ. Res. 32(1980):3640.Google Scholar
Scearce, W. K. and Jensen, R. B.Food Stamp Program Effects on Availability of Food Nutrients for Low Income Families in the Southern Region of the United States.S. Agr J. Econ. 11(1979): 113–20.Google Scholar
Stucker, T. A. and Boehm, W. T.A Guide to Understanding the 1977 Food and Agricultural Legislation. ESCS, USDA, Agr. Econ. Rept. 411, Sept. 1978.Google Scholar
Tobin, J.Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.Econometrica 26(1958):2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. A. and Price, D. W.The Effects of Income, Assets, Food Programs, and Household Size on Food Consumption.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):725–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar