Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:23:14.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Impacts on Demand of Agricultural Commodity Promotion*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Ronald Raikes
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
William Vollink
Affiliation:
Iowa State University

Extract

Producer “checkoff” programs have been established for several agricultural commodities. Typically, at least part of the money collected is used to support commodity promotions. But decisions about support of promotions often are made with little information about expected impacts on demand. Studies of selected commodity promotions have provided estimates of promotions' impacts on intercepts of demand functions. But these studies have not provided information about impacts on other demand parameters; viz., the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in commodity price, prices of competing commodities or consumer income. The purpose of this paper is to suggest and illustrate a research procedure that provides estimates of a promotion's impacts on the demand function's intercept and on responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price, competing prices and income.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Journal Paper No. J-8275 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 1978.

References

[1] Brown, Sidney E. Retail Sales of Broilers and Meat as Affected by Price, Display Area, and Newspaper Advertising, Marketing Economics Division, Economic Research Service (Publ.), ERS-180, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., May 1964.Google Scholar
[2] Clement, W.E., Henderson, P.L., and Eley, C.P.. The Effect of Different Levels of Promotional Expenditures on Fluid Milk, Economic Research Service (Publ.), ERS-259, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Oct. 1965.Google Scholar
[3] Fuller, W.A., and Battese, G.E.. “Estimation of Linear Models with Crossed-Error Structure,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 6778, May 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Grubbs, V.D., Clement, W.E., and Hunter, J.S.. Results of a Promotional Campaign for Lamb in Sacramento, California, Market Development Branch, Market Research Service, Agriculture Marketing Service (Publ.), MRR-200, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1957.Google Scholar
[5] Lester, W.B., and Branson, R.E.. Netted Lamb Roasts: Texas Consumer Market Test, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (Publ.), MP-821, College Station, Texas, Dec. 1966.Google Scholar
[6] McClelland, E.L., Leo, Polopolus, and Meyers, L.H.. “Optimal Allocation of Generic Advertising Budgets,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 365372, Nov. 1971.Google Scholar
[7] Myers, Lester H.Advertising Response Functions with Random Coefficients,” in Measurement of Sales Response to Generic Promotion of Food Products: Seminar Proceedings, Texas Agricultural Market Research and Development Center, Texas Agricultural Extension Service (Publ.), MRC-73-6, pp. 2132, College Station, Texas, Oct. 1973.Google Scholar
[8] Nerlove, Marc, and Waugh, F.V.. “Advertising Without Supply Control: Some Implications of a Study of the Advertising of Oranges,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. XLIII, No. 4, Part 1, pp. 813837, Nov. 1961.Google Scholar
[9] Ward, Ronald W.Evaluation of Generic Advertising Effectiveness with Econometrics,” in Measurement of Sales Response to Generic Promotion of Food Products: Seminar Proceedings, Texas Agricultural Market Research and Development Center, Texas Agricultural Extension Service (Publ.), MRC-73-6, pp. 5578, College Station, Texas, Oct. 1973.Google Scholar
[10] Waugh, Frederick V.Needed Research on the Effectiveness of Farm Products Promotions,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. XLI, No. 2, pp. 364376, May 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar