Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:59:47.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Power in Poultry Production Contracting? Evidence from aFarm Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

James M. MacDonald  and
Nigel Key
James M. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Economists, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture., Washington, D.C.
Nigel Key
Affiliation:
Economists, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture., Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exercise of market power by broiler processing firms (integrators) isplausible because local markets for growers are concentrated and becausegrowers face hold-up risks arising from substantial investments in specificassets set against limited integrator purchase commitments. This articleexplores the links between local integrator concentration and growercompensation under production contracts using data from the 2006 broilerversion of the USDA's Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Results ofthis study, which account for characteristics of the operation and specificfeatures of the production contract, suggest that greater integratorconcentration results in a small but economically meaningful reduction ingrower compensation.

Keywords

broilersmarket powermonopsonyoligopsonypoultryproduction contractsL11L13Q12
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 477 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi . Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D.L. Cash Flow Estimates for Contract Broiler Production in Georgia: A 30-Year Analysis. University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Bulletin 1228, revised, 2011.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R.A., Korb, P., O'Donoghue, E.J., and Banker, D.E. Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm Report, 2007 Edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Information Bulletin No. 24. 2007.Google Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R.A., and Alchian, A.A. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” The Journal of Law & Economics 21(1978):297–326.10.1086/466922Google Scholar
Knoeber, C.R. “A Real Game of Chicken: Contracts, Tournaments, and the Production of Broilers.” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 5(1989):271–92.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.M. The Economic Organization of U.S. Broiler Production. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Information Bulletin No. 38, 2008.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.M., Handy, C., and Plato, G. “Competition and Prices in USDA Commodity Procurement.” Southern Economic Journal 69(2002):128–43.10.2307/1061560Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.M., and Wang, S.L. “Foregoing Subtherapeutic Antibiotics: The Impact on Broiler Grow-out Operations.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33(2011):79–99.10.1093/aepp/ppq030Google Scholar
National Research Council. Understanding American Agriculture: Challenges for the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Panel to Review USDA's Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2008.Google Scholar
RTI International. GIPSA Livestock and Meat Marketing Study. Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture. Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration. 2007. Internet site: http://www.gipsa.usda.gov/GIPSA/webapp? area=home&subject=lmp&topic=ir-mms.Google Scholar
Sexton, R., and Lavoie, N. “Food Processing and Distribution: An Industrial Organization Approach.” Handbook of Agricultural Economics, volume lb. Gardner, B.L., and Rausser, G.C., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, 2001.Google Scholar
Tsoulouhas, T., and Vukina, T. “Regulating Broiler Contracts: Tournaments versus Fixed Performance Standards.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001):1062–73.10.1111/0002-9092.00230Google Scholar
Vukina, T., and Leegomonchai, P. “Oligopsony Power, Asset Specificity, and Hold-Up: Evidence from the Broiler Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2006):589–605.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00881.xGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L.W., ed. Concentration and Price. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. “Transactions Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” The Journal of Law & Economics 22(1979):233–62.10.1086/466942Google Scholar