Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:03:42.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Market for Citrus Harvesting Labor*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Robert D. Emerson ,
Thomas S. Walker  and
Chris O. Andrew
Robert D. Emerson
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Thomas S. Walker
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Chris O. Andrew
Affiliation:
Stanford Food Research Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of aggregate agricultural labor market studies exist, typically concentrated on data at the national level. The Florida agricultural labor market, however, differs substantially from that of the rest of the nation, excepting California. In Florida, a large portion of the labor force is employed as harvesting labor. This is not only highly seasonal work, but also among the least demanding of skill. Also, over the period 1953-57 to 1967-69, the total number of farm workers declined in 49 states and by 43 percent nationally. During this time, Florida, however, experienced a 53 percent increase in hired labor usage, more than offsetting a 38 percent decline in family labor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , July 1976 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 9097.

References

[1] Bauer, L. L. “The Effect of Technology on the Farm Labor Market,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(1969):605–618.Google Scholar
[2] Bureau of Employment Service, Florida Department of Commerce, Farm Labor and Rural Manpower Annual Report, Tallahasse, Florida, Various issues, 1964-1973.Google Scholar
[3] Fisher, Lloyd H. The Harvest Labor Market in California, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
[4] Florida Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Florida Agricultural Statistics—Citrus Summary, Orlando, Florida, 1973 and other issues.Google Scholar
[5] Florida Industrial Commission. Florida Employment Statistics, Tallahassee, Florida, Various issues, 1960-1974.Google Scholar
[6] McElroy, Robert C. and Gavett., Earle E. Termination of the Bracero Program: Some Effects on Farm Labor and Migrant Housing Needs, ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 77, Washington, D.C, June 1965.Google Scholar
[7] Schmitz, Andrew and Seckler, David. “Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(1970):569–577.Google Scholar
[8] Schuh, G. Edward. “An Econometric Investigation of the Market for Hired Labor in Agriculture,” Journal of Farm Economics, 44(1962):307–321.Google Scholar
[9] Smith, T. Lynn. “Farm Trends in the United States 1910-1969,” International Labor Review, 102(1970): 149–169.Google Scholar
[10] Spurlock, A. H. Costs of Picking and Hauling Citrus Fruit, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1950-51 through 1972-1973.Google Scholar
[11] Theil, Henri. Principles of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[12] Tyrchniewicz, Edward W. and Schuh, G. Edward. “Regional Supply of Hired Labor to Agriculture,” Journal of Farm Economics, 48(1966):537–556.Google Scholar
[13] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Farm Labor, Statistical Reporting Service, Washington, D.C., Monthly through 1973.Google Scholar
[14] Walker, Thomas S. “Economic Analysis of the Domestic and Foreign Hired Agricultural Labor Market in Florida,” unpublished master's thesis, University of Florida, 1975.Google Scholar
[15] Wallace, T. Dudley and Hoover, Dale M.. “Income Effects of Innovation: The Case of Labor in Agriculture,” Journal of Farm Economics, 48(1966): 325–335.Google Scholar
[16] Wise, Donald E. “The Effect of the Bracero on Agricultural Production in California,” Economic Inquiry, 12(1974): 547–558.Google Scholar