Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:22:37.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lead-Lag Relationships Between Pork Prices at the Retail, Wholesale, and Farm Levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Steven E. Miller
Steven E. Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Knowledge of the lead-lag relationships among the retail, wholesale, and farm level prices of a livestock commodity is of obvious importance both in econometric model building and in evaluation of packers' and retailers' margins for that commodity. Though the lead-lag relationships for beef prices have been investigated in several previous studies (Barksdale et al.; Franzmann and Walker; King; Miller; National Commission on Food Marketing), the only known previous study of the lead-lag relationships for pork is that made by the National Commission on Food Marketing (hereafter abbreviated NCFM). As that study used data for 1962-1965, changes in the pork marketing system in subsequent years may have in turn occassioned changes in the lead-lag relationships. The changes in the pork marketing system include changes in market structure at the farm, packer, and retail levels, increased use of formula pricing, and the demise of terminal markets, among others. Also, as discussed hereafter, the statistical method used in the NCFM analysis of lead-lag relationships involved certain problems which may invalidate the conclusions drawn in that study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , July 1980 , pp. 73 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barksdale, H.C., Hilliard, J. E., and Ahlund, M. C.. “A Cross-Spectral Analysis of Beef Prices.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 57(1975):309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M.. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (rev. ed.). San Francisco: Holden Day, 1976.Google Scholar
Franzmann, J. R. and Walker, R. L.. “Trend Models of Feeder Slaughter, and Wholesale Beef Cattle Prices.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 54(1972):507–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37(1969):424–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, L. D. “Checking the Independence of Two Covariance-Stationary Time Series: A Univariate Residual Cross Correlation Approach.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71(1976):378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, L. D. and Box, G.E.P.. “Identification of Dynamic Regression (Distributed Lag) Models Connecting Two Time Series.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 72(1977):121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. A. “Transmission of Week-to-Week Change in Choice Beef Prices Between Farm, Carcass and Retail Levels,” paper read at AAEA meeting, Pennsylvania State University, 1976.Google Scholar
Miller, S. E. “Univariate Residual Cross Correlation Analysis: An Application to Beef Prices.” N. Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 1(1979):141–6.Google Scholar
National Commission on Food Marketing. Organization and Competition in the Livestock and Meat Industry. Tech. Study No. 1, 1966.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. A. “Relationships — and the Lack There of — Between Economic Time Series, with Special Reference to Money and Interest Rates.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71(1977a):11–22.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. A. “Rejoinder: ‘Relationships — and the Lack Thereof — Between Economic Time Series, with Special Reference to Money and Interest Rates.”’ J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71(1977b):24–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. “Comment: ‘Relationships — and the Lack Thereof — Between Economic Time Series, with Special Reference to Money and Interest Rates.’” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71(1977):23–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Weekly Estimates of Prices and Price Spreads for Beef and Pork. Meat Animals Program Area, ESCS, CED, various issues.Google Scholar