Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:41:49.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Irrigation Water Supply as a Bioeconomic Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Gary D. Lynne
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
William G. Boggess
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Kenneth M. Portier
Affiliation:
Statistics Department, University of Florida

Abstract

Irrigation water is produced within the irrigation subprocess of a farm. Water supply is identified for effective field water, which sets the upper bound on water available for plant use. Georgescu-Roegen process analysis concepts are merged with the neoclassical theory of cost as the underlying framework. The approach is illustrated for a permanent overhead system used in a Florida citrus grove. The marginal cost for the 2.54 centimeters application depth dominates all other depths for the higher water levels. Process analysis is an important analytical tool for increasing understanding of the features of irrigation water supply.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R., Dillon, J. L., and Hardaker, J. B. Agricultural Decision Analysis, Ames: The Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. and Maass, A.. A Simulation of Irrigation Systems, USDA, ESCS Tech. Bull. No. 1431, 1978.Google Scholar
Boggess, W. G., Lynne, G. D., Jones, J. W., and Swaney, D. P.Risk-Return Assessment of Irrigation Decisions in Humid Regions.So. J. Agr. Econ., 15(1983):135144.Google Scholar
Bras, R. L. and Cordova, J. R.Intraseasonal Water Allocation in Deficit Irrigation.Water Resources Research, 17(1981):866874.Google Scholar
Choate, R. E. and Harrison, D. S. Irrigate by the Accounting Method, Circular 431, Gainesville. Florida Coop. Ext. Service, Univ. of Florida, 1977.Google Scholar
d'Almada, P. J., Lynne, G. D., and Smajstria, A.. A User's Manual for the FARM Systems Lab Irrigation Cost Generator, Food and Res. Econ. Dept., Econ. Info. Rpt. 157, Gainesville: Univ. of Florida, Jan. 1982.Google Scholar
David, W. P. and Hiler, E. A.Predicting Irrigation Requirements of Crops.J. of Irrig, and Drain Div., 96(1970):241255.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N.The Economics of Production”. Amer. Econ. Rev., 60(May, 1970):19.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971 (4th printing 1981).Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N.Process Analysis and the Neoclassical Theory of the Firm”. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 54(May, 1972):279294.Google Scholar
Gowon, D. T., Anderson, J. C., and Biswas, B.. “An Economic Interpretation of the Impact of Phenologically Timed Irrigation on Corn Yield”. W. J. Agr Econ., 3(Dec, 1978):145156.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. E., Israelson, O. W., and Stringham, G. E. Irrigation Principles and Practices, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1980.Google Scholar
Hexern, R. W. and Heady, E. O. Water Production Functions for Irrigated Agriculture, Ames: The Iowa State University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. S. Irrigation Systems for Crop Production in Florida, IFAS Water Resources Council, WRC-8, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1978.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. S. and Koo, R. C. J. Irrigation Methods and Equipment for Production of Citrus in Florida, IFAS Water Resources Council, WRC-10, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1978.Google Scholar
Kletke, D., Harris, T. R., and Mapp, H. P. Jr.. Irrigation Cost Program Users Reference Manual, Oklahoma State University, Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Rpt. P-770, Stillwater: Okla. State Univ., May 1978.Google Scholar
Koo, R. C. J. A Study of Soil Moisture in Relation to Absorption and Transpiration by Citrus, Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1953.Google Scholar
Koo, R. C. J.Evapotranspiration and Soil Moisture Determination as Guides to Citrus Irrigation”. Proceedings of the First International Citrus Symposium, 3(1969):17251730.Google Scholar
Koo, R. C. J. and Sites, J. W.Results of Research Response of Citrus to Supplemental Irrigation.Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Fla., 15(1955):180190.Google Scholar
Lacewell, R. D. and McGrann, J. M.Research and Extension Issues in Production Economics”. So. J. Agr. Econ., 14(July, 1982):6576.Google Scholar
Lembke, W. D. and Jones, B. A. Jr.. “Selecting a Method for Scheduling Irrigation, Using a Simulation Model”. Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 15(1972):284286.Google Scholar
Miller, S. F., Boersma, L. L., and Castle, E. N. Irrigation Water Values in the Williamette Valley: A Study of Alternative Valuation Methods, Oregon State Univ., Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 85, Corvallis, Oregon, 1965.Google Scholar
Miller, S. F. and Halter, A. N.Systems-Simulation in a Practical Policy-Making Setting: The Venezuelan Cattle Industry”. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 55(1973):420432.Google Scholar
Muraro, R. P. Budgeting Costs and Returns: Central Florida Citrus Production, 1979-80, Econ. Info. Rpt. 132, Food and Resource Econ. Dept., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, June, 1980.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. I. and Hagan, R. M.Functions to Predict Effects of Crop Water Deficits”. J. of Irr. and Drain. Div., ASCE, 99(1973):421439.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. I., Hagan, R. M., and Pruitt, W. O.Functions to Predict Optimal Irrigation Programs”. J. of Irr. and Drain. Div., ASCE, 100(1974):179199.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1978 Census of Agriculture. Irrigation. Vol. 4, AC78-IR, Washington: U.S. Superintendent of Documents, Feb. 1982.Google Scholar