Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:17:43.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration and Behavior in the U.S. Winter Market for Fresh Tomatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kenrick H. Jordan  and
John J. VanSickle
Kenrick H. Jordan
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
John J. VanSickle
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alternative hypotheses of market integration in the U.S winter market for fresh tomatoes were evaluated using a dynamic model of spatial price adjustment. The results showed that while Florida and Mexico were integrated in the same market, a price change in one area was not instantaneously reflected in the other. Lagged effects were important with long-run integration being supported for both Florida and Mexico and short-run integration for Mexico. However, the information flow, while relatively efficient, was not symmetric. Florida was found to be dominant in the price formation process with Mexico responding to changes in the Florida price.

Keywords

Floridamarket integrationMexicopricingtomatoes
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 127 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamowicz, W.L., Baah, S.O and Hawkins, M.H.. “Pricing Efficiency in Hog Markets”. Can. J. Agr. Econ. 32, (1984):462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardeni, Pier G. “Does the Law of One Price Really Hold for Commodity Prices?” Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 71, (1989):661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baffes, John. “Some Further Evidence on The Law of One Price: The Law of One Price Still Holds.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73, (1991): 1264–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessler, David A. and Brandt, Jon A.. “Causality in Livestock Markets.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64, (1982): 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, K.C., VanSickle, J. J., Bredahl, M. E., Belibasis, E. and Gutierrez, N.. Florida and Mexico Competition for the Fresh Winter Vegetable Market. Washington, D.C, U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS-Agricultural Economic Report No. 556, 1986.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Willard W. “The Market as a Unit of Inquiry in Agricultural Economics Research,” J. Farm Econ. 39, (1957):21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, D.A., and Fuller, W.A.. “Distribution of Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 24, (1979):427–31.Google Scholar
Dickey, D.A., and Fuller, W.A.. “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Econometrica 49, (1981): 1057–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Leonidas P.Preview of Mexico's Vegetable Production for Export. Washington, D.C, U.S. Department of Agriculture, FAS M-297, 1980.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F., and Yoo, B.S.. “Forecasting and Testing in Cointegrated Systems.” J.Econometrics 35, (1987):143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fackler, Paul L. “Spatial Equilibrium and Tests of Market Integration.” Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Association of Agricultural Economics, 1-4 August, 1993.Google Scholar
Faminow, Merle D. and Benson, Bruce L.. “Integration in Spatial Markets.” Amer. J.Agr. Econ. 72, (1990):49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B. K.. and Schroeder, T.C. “Testing Perfect Spatial Market Integration: An Application to Regional U.S. Cattle Markets,” N. C. J. Agr. Econ. 12, (1990): 173–185.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B. K. and Schroeder, T.C.. “Cointegration Tests and Spatial Price Linkages in Regional Cattle Markets,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73, (1991):452–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravallion, Martin. “Testing Market Integration.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 68, (1986): 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. Marketing Florida Fruits and Vegetables. Washington, D.C, annual issues, 1979-1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. Marketing Mexico Fruits and Vegetables. Washington, D.C, annual issues, 1979-1989.Google Scholar