Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T09:33:14.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Substituting the Transactions Tax for the Farm Real Estate Tax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Fred C. White
Fred C. White*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department, University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The fact that the local property tax remained virtually unchanged for so many decades prior to the 1950s is remarkable, considering the myriad modifications that have emerged during the past quarter century. Perhaps the historically low tax rates shielded many of its unfavorable characteristics which have been attacked in recent years. Because of rising land values and rising tax rates per dollar of value, the property tax in a majority of the states was modified, usually to protect agricultural or residential interests. Two factors contributed to the passage of the many tax reform programs for agriculture: (1) a belief that property taxes discriminated against farmers because farmers paid a disproportionate share of their income in property taxes and (2) a desire to affect land use by preserving farmland and open space.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , December 1978 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Property Tax Circuit Breakers: Current Status and Policy Issues, M87, Washington, D.C., February 1975.Google Scholar
[2]Hady, Thomas F. and Sibold, Ann G.. State Programs for the Differential Assessment of Farm and Open Space Land, Agricultural Economics Report No. 256, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., April 1974.Google Scholar
[3]Herber, Bernard P.Modern Public Finance, the Study of Public Sector Economics. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[4]Musgrave, Richard A.The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1959.Google Scholar
[5]Stam, Jerome M. and Sibold, Ann G.. Agriculture and the Property Tax: A Forward Look Based on a Historical Perspective, Agricultural Economics Report No. 392, Economic Research Service U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., November 1977.Google Scholar
[6]Tweeten, Luther G.Foundations of Farm Policy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[7]U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1974 Census of Agriculture, Vol. I, Georgia, Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar