Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:35:02.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Capital and Labor Turnover in Manufacturing Industries: The Case of a Relatively Undeveloped Region in Southeast Ohio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Emmanuel T. Acquah  and
Leroy J. Hushak
Emmanuel T. Acquah
Affiliation:
Bureau of Economic Research and Development, Virginia State College
Leroy J. Hushak
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University and The Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since 1970, increased attention has been devoted to examining the development potential of rural areas. Among the contributing factors are the reversal of population migration trends which began about 1970, the increasing dispersion of manufacturing activities, and the congestion and population losses of central urban cities. This study, as part of Title V research in Ohio, is an examination of labor force behavior in manufacturing. Although manufacturing employment has declined in relation to total employment in the region, the manufacturing sector has been and continues to be one of the major sources of income and employment. The characteristics and behavior of labor in this region are expected to be similar to those of many other rural areas in the United States, particularly areas of the Appalachian region.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , December 1978 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Acquah, E. T. “Labor Productivity and Turnover in Manufacturing Industries: The Case of a Five County Region in Southeastern Ohio,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1976.Google Scholar
[2]Beale, Calvin L. “A Further Look at Nonmetropolitan Growth Since 1970,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, December 1976, pp. 953–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Becker, G. S.Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
[4]Griliches, Z. “Sources of Measured Productivity Growth: United States Agriculture, 1940-1960,” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 71, August 1963, pp. 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Layard, Richard and Psacharopoulos, George. “The Screening Hypothesis and Returns to Education,” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 82, September 1974, pp. 985–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, Division of Research and Statistics. Various Publications, 1970 and 1975.Google Scholar
[7]Parsons, Donald O. “Specific Human Capital: An Application to Quit Rates and Layoff Rates,” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 80, November 1972, pp. 1120–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Scott, Loren C, Smith, Lewis H., and Rungeling, Brian. “Labor Force Participation in Southern Rural Labor Markets,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 59, May 1977, pp. 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]U. S. Census of Population. Ohio, PC(1)-C37, 1970.Google Scholar
[10]U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. “Estimates of the Population of Ohio Counties and Metropolitan Areas: July 1, 1974 and 1975,” Current Population Reports, Series P-26, No. 75-35, September, 1976.Google Scholar
[11]Widner, Ralph R., ed. “A Framework For Ohio Development Policy,” Columbus: Academy for Contemporary Problems, 1977.Google Scholar