Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:37:27.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government Policy, Wind Erosion, and Economic Viability in Semi-Arid Agriculture: The Case of the Southern Texas High Plains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Julie A. Bunn
Julie A. Bunn*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Macalester College, St. Paul, Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 1996 farm bill challenges agricultural producers to pursue conservation objectives while allowing flexibility and reducing subsidies. The nature of this challenge for semi-arid rainfed, wind-erosion-prone agriculture is explored via a behavioral model. Simulations of farm-firm decision making under scenarios in the southern Texas High Plains are evaluated. Results indicate that the removal of subsidies, while lowering farm incomes, does not, under most assumptions, alter cropping system choice. Alternatively, under a variety of assumptions, the imposition of an erosion tax shuts down cropping.

Keywords

conservation practicescropping system choiceeconomic dynamicsFAIR Act of 1996
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , December 1998 , pp. 339 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bunn, J.A. “Alternative Beliefs About Conservation Practices and Soil-Productivity Relationships, and the Long-Run Outlook for Agriculture on the Southern Texas High Plains.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. 52(1997):368-75.Google Scholar
Bunn, J.A. “Economic Dynamics of Cropping System Choice and Land Degradation: Technical Document.” Dept. of Econ., Macalester College, St. Paul MN, 1995.Google Scholar
Burt, O.R. “Farm-Level Economics of Soil Conservation in the Palouse Area of the Northwest.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63(1981):83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, J.R., and Taylor, C.A. Jr. “Economic Analysis of Grazing Strategies in the Edwards Plateau.” In Abstracts, Society for Management, 41st Annual Meeting, Corpus Christi TX, 1988.Google Scholar
Daberkow, S.G., Langley, J., and Beach, E.D.. “Farmers' Use of Hex Acres.” Choices (2nd Quarter 1995):22–23.Google Scholar
Ethridge, D.E. Professor, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Texas Tech University, Lubbock. Telephone conversation, 3 April 1995.Google Scholar
Ethridge, D.E., Pettit, R.D., Sudderth, R.G., and Stoecker, A.L.. “Optimal Economic Timing of Range Improvement Alternatives: Southern High Plains.” J. Range Manage. 40(1987):555-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethridge, D.E., Zhang, P., Dahl, B.E., Ervin, R.T., and Rushemeza, J.. “Cattle Ranching Production and Marketing Strategies Under Combined Price and Weather Risk.” West. J. Agr. Econ. 15(1990):175-85.Google Scholar
Huszar, P.C., and Piper, S.L.. “Estimating the Off-Site Costs of Wind Erosion in New Mexico.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. 41(1986):414-16.Google Scholar
Jordan, J.L., and Elnagheeb, A.H.. “The Structure of Citizen Preferences for Government Soil Erosion Control Programs.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 24(1992):73–82.Google Scholar
Lacewell, R.D., and Lee, J.G.. “Land and Water Management Issues: Texas High Plains.” In Water and Arid Lands of the Western United States, eds., El-Ashry, M.T. and Gibborn, D.G.. London/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lai, R. “Effects of Soil Erosion on Crop Productivity.” CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 5(1987):303-67.Google Scholar
Lee, J.G. “Risk Implications of the Transition to Dryland Agricultural Production on the Texas High Plains.” Unpub. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Agr. Econ., Texas A&M University, 1987.Google Scholar
McConnell, K.E. “An Economic Model of Soil Conservation.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranowski, J.A. “Impacts of Productivity Loss on Crop Production and Management in a Dynamic Economic Model.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 66(1984):61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, D.E., and Popper, F.J.. “The Great Plains: From Dust to Dust.” Planning (1987):13–18.Google Scholar
Runge, C.F. “Environmental Protection from Farm to Market.” In Thinking Ecologically: The Next Generation of Environmental Policy, eds., Chertow, M.R. and Esty, D.C.. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Saliba, B.C. “Soil Productivity and Farmers' Erosion Control Incentives—A Dynamic Modeling Approach.” West. J. Agr. Econ. 10(1985):354-64.Google Scholar
Segarra, E., and Taylor, D.B.. “Farm-Level Dynamic Analysis of Soil Conservation: An Application to the Piedmont Area of Virginia.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 19(1987):61–73.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.A., Garza, N.E. Jr., and Brooks, T.D.. “Grazing Systems on the Edwards Plateau of Texas: Are They Worth the Trouble?” Range-lands 15(1993):57–60.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Extension Service. “Cow-Calf Budgets: Texas High Plains.” TAES, College Station TX, March 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Costs of Production—Major Field Crops. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector Series, ECIFS 9-5. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. “1982-1987 Natural Resources Inventory, State: Texas.” Computer-generated tables, USDA/SCS State Office, Temple TX, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. “Texas, State and County Data.” In 1992 Census of Agriculture, Vol. 1: Geographic Area Series. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994. [Online. Census of Agriculture, Texas: County Data, Tables 1 and 6. Available at Government Information Sharing Project, Oregon State University web site: http://govinfo.library.orst.edu/cgi-bin/agstate?Texas.]Google Scholar
Walker, D.J. “Damage Function to Evaluate Erosion Control Economics.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):690-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zulauf, C., and Tweeten, L.. “The Post-Commodity-Program World: Production Adjustments of Major U.S. Field Crops.” Choices (1st Quarter 1996):8–10.Google Scholar