Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:32:52.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food Stamp Participation Among Low-Income Households: Theoretical Considerations of the Impact on the Demand for Food*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ron Mittelhammer  and
Donald A. West
Ron Mittelhammer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Washington State University
Donald A. West
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Washington State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The USDA's Food Stamp Program (FSP) is a major item in the department's budget. In effect from 1939 to 1943 and revived as a pilot program in 1961, FSP has grown until, in 1973, it provided nearly $4 billion in food stamps to an average of 12 million persons per month. About 55 percent of the $4 billion is federal subsidy. The program is continuing to expand as a result of a congressional mandate that FSP be in effect nationwide after June 30, 1974. Because of the FSP's growth, questions are now being asked about the program's impact on demand for food in the United States.

In its pre-World War II inception, FSP was developed as an alternative to direct distribution of commodities to relief families. Although the objective of improving food consumption among needy households was recognized, FSP was viewed primarily as a method for stimulating demand for farm products.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , July 1975 , pp. 223 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 3-5, 1975.

References

[1] Bunting, Fredricka and Corinne Le, Bovit. “Percent of Income Spent for Food — Estimates from National Income and Household Survey Data,” National Food Situation, NSF-137, August 1971, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
[2] “Current Labor Statistics,” Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, selected issues, 1960-73.Google Scholar
[3] Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Agricultural Letter No. 1269, April 12, 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Food Stamp Act of 1964, U.S. Congress, House Report No. 1228, March 9, 1964.Google Scholar
[5] “Food Stamp Participation: A Profile,” Food and Nutrition, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, December 1973, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
[6] Love, Harold G. “The Reasons Participants Drop Out of the Food Stamp Program: A Case Study and Its Implication,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 52, No. 3, August 1970, pp. 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Southworth, Herman M. “The Economics of Public Measures to Subsidize Food Consumption,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, February 1945, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar
[8] Thurow, Lester C. “Cash Versus In-Kind Transfers,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, May 1974„pp. 190–195.Google Scholar
[9] United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Statistics, Selected Years, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
[10] United States Department of Agriculture, Food Stamp Facts, Food and Nutrition Service, FNS-72, July 1973.Google Scholar
[11] United States Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 81, “Characteristics of the Low-Income Population, 1970,” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1971.Google Scholar
[12] United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Consumer Expenditure and Income, Total United States, Urban and Rural, 1960-61,” BLS Report No. 237-93, Supplement 3, Part A, May 1966.Google Scholar