Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:05:46.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial Implications of Waste Management Systems for Shellfish Processing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Ronald M. North  and
Fred M. Lyda
Ronald M. North
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Fred M. Lyda
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Shellfish harvesting, processing and marketing are components of an old, established industry in southeastern coastal areas. This traditional industry, with proven production records and established markets for its high-quality shrimp, is being subjected to difficult circumstances which could result in a significant restructuring of various segments of it. Processors are faced with very expensive control outlays required to reduce pollution levels in coastal waters. These pollution control problems are particularly perplexing for both old and new firms, since solutions lead only to higher processing costs in a competitive market, heavily influenced by international conditions.

Financial effects of effluent discharge guidelines are already being felt by processors in those states where early compliance dates are being specified by State environmental protection agencies. In many instances State standards are more stringent than those of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In addition, alternative waste treatment methods have been rejected by some State agencies, resulting in higher costs for meeting specified effluent discharge guidelines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 27 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work is a result of research supported partially by NOAA, Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce, under Grant #04-3-158-6, and partially by the Institute of Natural Resources, The University of Georgia.

References

[1] Prochaska, F.J. and Andres, C.O.. “Shrimp Processing in the Southeast: Supply Problems and Structural Change,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 247.252 July 1974.Google Scholar
[2] Whitaker, Donald R. “Economic Impact of Effluent Guidelines on Seafoood Processors: With Particular Reference to the Gulf,” Proceedings of the Technology Transfer Conference on Upgrading Seafood Processing Facilities to Reduce Pollution, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 6, 1974.Google Scholar
[3] Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 26, February 6, 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Horn, C.E. Characterization and Treatability of Selected Shellfish Processing Wastes, Atlanta, Ga.: Georgia Institute of Technology, August 1972.Google Scholar
[5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Catfish, Crab, Shrimp and Tuna Segment of the Canned and Preserved Seafood Processing, Washington, D.C., June 1974.Google Scholar
[6] Quick, T.P. and Shick, J.E.. “Economic Guidelines for Analysis of Joint Industrial-Municipal Collection and Treatment Systems,” Costs of Water Pollution Control, Raleigh, N.C.: North Carolina Water Resources Institute.Google Scholar