Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:00:44.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Value-added Production on Cow-Calf Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Michael P. Popp
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, University of Manitoba
Merle D. Faminow
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, University of Manitoba
Lucas D. Parsch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas

Abstract

Factors that affect the decision to feed or sell calves at weaning are analyzed for Arkansas cow-calf operators. A discrete choice logit model is used to analyze the adoption of value-added cattle production. Farm size, human capital, perception of risk/returns and enterprise diversification are hypothesized to explain this decision. Regional factors and land quality are also accounted for. Operator perceptions towards risk, profitability and facilities were important. Production control and attention to marketing were also significant, but farm size and scale of cattle production had a minimal impact. Effects of human capital and off-farm labor opportunities need further investigation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. H. and Nelson, F. D.. “Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models.” Sage University Paper # 45. Sage Publications Inc., Beverly Hills, CA, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, B., Lacy, J. R., Workman, J. P., and Siddoway, F. H.. “Profit Maximization as a Management Goal on Southeastern Montana Ranches.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 9, 1(1984): 186194.Google Scholar
Caswell, M. and Zilberman, D.. “The Choices of Irrigation Technologies in California.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 2(1985):224234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinar, A. and Yaron, D.. “Influence of Quality and Scarcity of Inputs on the Adoption of Modern Irrigation Technologies.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15, 2(1990):224233.Google Scholar
Dorfman, J. H.Modeling Multiple Adoption Decisions in a Joint Framework.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, 3(1996):547557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethridge, D. F., Zhang, P., Dahl, B. E., Ervin, R. T., and Rashemeza, J.. “Cattle Ranching Production and Marketing Strategies under Combined Price and Weather Risks.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15, 2(1990): 175185.Google Scholar
Feder, G.Adoption of Interrelated Agricultural Innovations: Complementarity and the Impacts of Risk, Scale, and Credit.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 1(1982):94101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G. and Slade, R.. “The Acquisition of Information and the Adoption of New Technology.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 3(1984):312320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuz, D.M. and Wagner, J.J.. “Retained Ownership: Understanding Performance Risk and Evaluating Marketing Alternatives.Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 60(1996):6571.Google Scholar
Gujarati, D.N.Basic Econometrics, third edition. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, 1995.Google Scholar
Haines, P.S., Guilkey, D.K., and Popkin, B.M.. “Modeling Food Consumption Decisions as a Two-step Process.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70, 3(1988):543552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. K., Rister, M. E., Mjelde, J. W., Drees, B. M., and Way, M. O.. “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Insect Management Technology.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 4(1990):9971005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L.A., Ferguson, K.W., and Rawls, E.L.. “Risk-return Comparisons of Tennessee Feeder Cattle Backgrounding Systems.Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. 53(1989):4146.Google Scholar
Lambert, D. K.Calf Retention and Production Decisions over Time.Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14, 1(1989):919.Google Scholar
Pardue, M.D., Popp, M.P., and Garner, C.R.. “Feeder Cattle Production Budgets for Arkansas, 1996: Estimated Costs and Returns at Specified Situations.” University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Technical Bulletin, ETB 205, 1997.Google Scholar
Popp, M. and Parsch, L.. “Production Practices of Arkansas Beef Cattle Producers”. University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 956. 1998.Google Scholar
Rahm, M.R. and Huffman, W.E.. “The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 4(1984):405413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlins, R. B. and Bernardo, D. J.. “Incorporating Uncertainty in the Analysis of Optimal Beef-Forage production Systems.Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23, 1(1991):213225.Google Scholar
Salant, P. and Dillman, D.A.. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1994.Google Scholar
Schroeder, T. C. and Featherstone, A. M.. “Dynamic Marketing and Production Decisions for Cow-calf Producers.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 4(1990):10281040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sy, H.A., Faminow, M.D., Johnson, G.V., and Crow, G.. “Estimating the Values of Cattle Characteristics Using an Ordered Probit Model.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 2(1997):463476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, D.L., Little, R.D., and Petry, T.A.. “Retained Ownership Is an Option for Cow-calf Operations.Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 51(1987):8087.Google Scholar
Young, K. D. and Shumway, C. R.. “Cow-calf Producers Perceived Profit Maximization Objectives: A Logit Analysis.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23, 1(1991): 129136.Google Scholar
Young, S. R. and Wilson, W.W.. “Credit Allocation Decisions of Wheat Exporting Countries.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 44, 1(1996):5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar