Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:36:48.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting Commercial Bank Lending to Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Eustacius N. Betubiza
Affiliation:
World Bank, Washington, D.C.
David J. Leatham
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Abstract

A tobit econometric procedure was used to examine the effect of selected demand and supply factors on nonreal estate agricultural lending by commercial banks in Texas. Results show that banks have reduced their agricultural loan portfolios in response to increased use of interest sensitive deposits after deregulation. Moreover, almost half of this decrease came from banks that stopped making agricultural loans. Also, results show that banks affiliated with multi-bank holding companies lend less money to agriculture relative to their assets than do independent banks.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, T.Regression Analysis When the Dependent Variable is Truncated Normal.Econometrica 41(1973):9971016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkley, David L., Mellon, Cindy, and Potts, Glenn T.. “Effects of Banking Structure on the Allocation of Credit to Nonmetropolitan Communities.W. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1984):283–92.Google Scholar
Barry, Peter J., and Pepper, W.H.. “Effects of Holding Company Affiliation on Loan-Deposit Relationships in Agricultural Banking.NC J. Agr. Econ. 7(1985):6573.Google Scholar
Bundt, Thomas P., and Scheitzer, Robert. “Deregulation, Deposit Markets, and Banks' Costs of Funds.The Fin. Rev. 24(1989):417–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, Oral Jr., and Love, John M.. “Determinants of Household Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables.” 5. J. Agr. Econ. 15(December, 1983): 127–32.Google Scholar
Gilbert R., Alton. “Requiem for Regulation Q: What It Did and Why It Passed Away.” Federal Reserve of St. Louis. Review 68(February 1986):2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gragg, J. G.Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods.Econometrica 39(1971):829–44.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Robert P.The Determinants of Household Vacation Travel: Some Empirical Evidence.Applied Econ. 13(1981): 225–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J.Shadow Price, Market Wages and Labor Supply.Econometrica 42(1974):679–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J.The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.Annals of Econ. and Soc. Measure. 5(1976):475–92.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J.Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.Econometrica 47(1979): 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, Michael C, and Zimmermann, Gary C.. “Competition of Money Market Deposit Accounts.” Proceedings: A Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, pp. 612–35. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (May, 1985)Google Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. Elem. of Econometrics. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Koch, Timothy W.Bank Management. Orlando, Florida: The Dryden Press, 1988.Google Scholar
McDonald, J.F., and Moffitt, R.A.. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.Rev. of Econ. and Statist. 62(1980):318–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railroad Commission of Texas. Oil and Gas Annual Report. Oil and Gas Division, Austin, Texas, several issues.Google Scholar
Thraen, C.S., Hammond, I.W., and Buxton, B.M.. “Estimating Components of Demand Elasticities from Cross-Sectional Data.Am. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):674–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, James. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.Econometrica 26(1958):2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Census of Agr. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C, several issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Local Area Personal Income 1983-88. Volume 5: Southwest, Rocky Mountain, and Far West Regions and Alaska and Hawaii. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. July, 1990.Google Scholar
Waldrop, R.Interest Rate Deregulation and Its Impact on the Cost of Funds at Commercial Banks.Banking and Econ. Rev. 4(March 1986): 1922.Google Scholar
Walraven, N.A., and Rosine, John. Agr. Fin. Data. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Washington D.C April, 1989.Google Scholar