Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:29:37.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the Benefits of Groundwater Contamination Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Henglun Sun ,
John C. Bergstrom  and
Jeffrey H. Dorfman
Henglun Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
John C. Bergstrom
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Jeffrey H. Dorfman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a conceptual model for estimating option price for groundwater quality protection is developed, and the effects of subjective demand and supply uncertainty and other variables on option price are examined. A contingent valuation study to measure option price for groundwater quality protection was conducted in southwestern Georgia. Valuation results suggest that the monetary benefits to citizens of protecting groundwater supplies from agricultural chemical contamination are quite large.

Keywords

option pricecontingent valuationuncertaintygroundwater contamination
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , December 1992 , pp. 63 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachtel, Douglas C.The Georgia County Guide. 7th ed. Athens, Ga: The Cooperative Extension Service, The University of Georgia, 1988.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, J.C., and Stoll, J.R.. “A Test of Contingent Market Bid Elicitation Procedures for Piecewise Valuation.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 12(1987): 104–108.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, J.C., Stoll, J.R., Titre, J.P., and Wright, V.L.. “Economic Value of Wetlands-based Recreation.” Ecobgical Econ., 2(1990): 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Richard C. “Option Value: An Exposition and Extension.” Land Economics, 58(1982): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, Peter. “Option Demand and Consumer's Surplus: Comment.” Am. Econ. Rev,. 65(1975): 733–736.Google Scholar
Bowker, J.M., and Stoll, J.R.. “Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988): 372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookshire, D.S., Eubanks, L.S., and Randall, A.. “Estimating Option Prices and Existence Values for Wildlife Resources.” Land Economics, 59(1983): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookshire, D.S., Ives, B., and Schulze, W.D.. “The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 3(1976): 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Trudy A. “A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 15(1988): 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S., and Schulze, W.D.. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowan and Allanheld, 1986.Google Scholar
Desvousges, W.H., Smith, V.K., and Fisher, A.. “Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvement: Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela River.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 14(1987): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, D.A.Mail and Telephone Survey: The Total Design Method New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
Edwards, Steven F. “Option Prices for Groundwater Protection.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 15(1988): 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A.M. III “Supply Uncertainty, Option Price, and Option Value.” Land Econ., 61(1985): 177–181.Google Scholar
Graham, D.A. “Cost-Benefit Analysis under Uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev., 71(1981): 7157–25.Google Scholar
Greenley, D.A., Walsh, R.G., and Young, R.A..”Option Value: Empirical Evidence from A Case Study of Recreation and Water Quality.” Quart. J. Econ., 96(1981):657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanemann, Michael W. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 66(1984): 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, L.R., Maslia, M.L., and Meeks, W.C.. Hydrology and Model Evaluation of the Principal Artesian Aquifer, Dougherty Plain, Southwest Georgia. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Georgia Geology Survey, Bulletin 97. 1983.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.. “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 22(1992): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krinsky, Itzhak, and Robb, A. L.. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Rev. Econ. and Stat, 1986: 715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnel, J.B.et al. Investigation of Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) in Ground Water on Seminole County, Georgia. Reston, Va: U.S. Dept. Inter., Geology Survey. Circular 933, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E.G., and Lee, L.K., The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals. Washington, DC: USDA ERS, Agr. Econ. Rpt. No 576, 1987.Google Scholar
Park, T., Loomis, J.B., and Creel, M.. “Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies.” Land Economics, 67(1991): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, R.R., Barbar, N.L., and Stiles, H.R.. Water Use in Georgia by County for 1980. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Natural Resource, Information Circular 59, p61. 1982Google Scholar
Plummer, M.L. “Supply Uncertainty, Option Price, and Option Value: An Extension.” Land Economics, 62(1986): 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. “Total and Nonuse Values.” In Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Braden, J.B. and Kolstad, C.D., eds. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
Rouhani, S., and Hall, T.J.. “Geostatistical Schemes for Groundwater Sampling.” J. Hydrology, 103(1988): 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellar, Christine, Chavas, J.P., and Stoll, J.R.. “Specification of the Logit Model: The Case of Valuation of Nonmarket Goods.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 13(1986): 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.K. “Comment: Arbitrary Values, Good Causes, and Premature Verdicts.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 22(1992): 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.K. “Uncertainty, Benefit-Cost Analysis, and the Treatment of Option Value.” J. Envir. Econ. Manag., 14(1987): 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar