Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:30:58.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimated Impact of Withdrawing Specified Pecticides from Cotton Production*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jim Casey
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Ronald D. Lacewell
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University

Extract

Pesticides have become a major input for commercial agriculture. The quantity of pesticides applied annually is approximately 140 million pounds. Even with this level of pesticide use, research indicates that per an additional dollar of pesticide use, returns are increased two to four dollars. However, recent emphasis on environmental quality has caused considerable pressure to discontinue use of some pesticides. This raises important questions regarding the impact of withdrawing specific pesticides from commercial agriculture.

In response to possible cancellations, research has been directed toward establishing expected effects. However, much of the completed research is directed principally at the producer level and associated economic consequences of restricting the use of a pesticide. Some of the pesticides evaluated are phenoxy herbicides, organochlorines and chlordane. Other studies have considered the effect of a tax and change in government farm policy on level of pesticide use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Texas A&M Univeristy Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Article No. 10105.

References

[1]Davis, V., et al., “Economic Consequences of Restricting the Use of Organo chlorine Insecticides on Cotton, Corn, Peanuts and Tobacco,” Agri. Econ. Report No. 178, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., March, 1970.Google Scholar
[2]Eichers, T., et al., “Quantities of Pesticides Used by Farmers in 1966,” Agri. Econ. Report No. 179, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., April, 1970.Google Scholar
[3]Fox, Austin S., et al., “Restricting the Use of Phenoxy Herbicides-Cost to Farmers,” Agri. Econ. Report No. 194, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1970.Google Scholar
[4]Fox, Austin, et al., “Restricting the Use of 2,4,5-T: Cost to Domestic Users,” Agri. Econ. Report No. 199, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., March, 1971.Google Scholar
[5]Headley, J. C., “Estimating the Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50:1, Feb. 1968, Pages 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Helmer, Olaf, “Analysis of the Future: The Delphi Method,” in Bright, James T., Technological Forecasting for Industry and Government, Methods and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1968.Google Scholar
[7]Jenkins, Robert T., “Economic Impact of Discontinuing Farm Use of Chlordane,” Agri. Econ. Report No. 231, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., Aug. 1972.Google Scholar
[8]Lacewell, Ronald D. and Masch, William R., “Economic Incentives to Reduce the Quantity of Chemicals Used in Commercial Agriculture,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4:1, 1972.Google Scholar
[9]Southerland, J. Gwyn, Carlson, Gerald A. and Hoover, Dale M., “Cost of Producing Cotton in the Southeast, 1966,” Economics Information Report No. 25, Department of Economics, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Oct. 1971.Google Scholar
[10] Texas Department of Agriculture, 1971 Texas Cotton Statistics, USDA, SRS.Google Scholar
[11]U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Statistics, 1971, U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[12]U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Economic Research on Pesticides for Policy Decision-making,” Proceedings of a Symposium, Washington, D.C., April, 1971.Google Scholar
[13] U.S. Department of Commerce, Census of Agriculture, 1969, County Report, U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar