Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:09:55.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy Accounting: The Case of Farm Machinery in Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Phillips Foster ,
John Flemming  and
Dennis Wichelns
Phillips Foster
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
John Flemming
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Dennis Wichelns
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Farm machinery energy accounting has taken basically three approaches.

The first approach is concerned with the energy embodied in farm machinery on a national basis. Two studies have attempted to show the aggregate amount of energy embodied in the manufacture of farm machinery. Using input-output analysis, Bullard et al. provide estimates of the energy costs of goods and services for 1967. Measured in BTUs per dollar of final product, the energy cost of farm machinery at 1967 price levels is given as: coal, 34,478 BTUs; natural gas, 24,794 BTUs; refined oil, 12,541 BTUs; and electricity, 5,396 BTUs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , July 1980 , pp. 189 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullard, Clark W., Penner, Peter S., and Pilati, David H.. “Energy Analysis: Handbook for Combining Process and Input-Output Analysis.” Center for Advanced Computation, University of Illinois, Oct. 1976, Table A-5, p. 52, as revised in accompanying errata sheet.Google Scholar
Doering, Otto C. IIIConsidine, Timothy J., and Harling, Catherine E.. “Accounting for Tillage Equipment and Other Machinery in Agricultural Energy Analysis.” Energy in Agriculture, Purdue University, Agr. Exp. Sta., June 1977, p. 4.Google Scholar
Foster, Phillips, Flemming, John, Wichelns, Dennis, and Roberts, Lamar. Fossil Fuel Energy Used in Agriculture, A Data Base for Maryland—1974. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta. M.P., in process.Google Scholar
Pimental, David, Hurd, L. E., Bellotti, A. C., Forster, M. J., Oka, I. M., Sholes, O. D., and Whitman, R. J.. “Food Production and the Energy Crisis.” Science 182(Nov. 1973):443–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA/FEA. Energy and U.S. Agriculture: 1974 Data Base. Vol. 1, Sept. 1976, p. 111.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1972 Census of Manufacturers. Washington, D.C., 1976, Vol. 1, Subject and Special Statistics, Section SR6, Table 3, “Quantity and Costs of Purchased Fuels Used for Heat and Power by Industry Group and Industry,” p. 21. In addition to the three fossil fuels mentioned here, the table lists coke and breeze. For farm machinery manufacturing, however, no data are given for coke and breeze because the data “failed to meet publication standards.”Google Scholar
U.S. Master Tax Guide, 1978. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., Nov. 1977, p. 430.Google Scholar