Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:05:32.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empirical Success Ratios in USDA Agricultural Utilization Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Harold B. Jones Jr.
Harold B. Jones Jr.*
Affiliation:
Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In assessing the prospective utility or value of a research program there are three important considerations: (1) potential impact the research will have on the scientific field involved, (2) probable benefits to industry or the public sector and (3) probability of success of projects in achieving these goals. Various studies have been made that emphasize the first and second objectives, i.e., trying to determine both scientific merit and economic value or return on investment in research projects and programs. This paper will be concerned with the latter objective; estimating the probable success of projects which were part of an organized agricultural research program conducted by USDA over a 25 year period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 123 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Blair, Morris M. Elementary Statistics, New York: Henry Holt and Co. 1944, pp. 314–349.Google Scholar
[2] Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Company, Management of New Products, New York; 1960, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
[3] Bright, James R. Research, Development and Technological Innovation: An Introduction, Homewood, Illinois; Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1964, pp. 424–474.Google Scholar
[4] Buzzell, R.D. and Nourse, R.E.. Product Innovation in Food Processing, 1954-64, Boston, Massachusetts: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1967, pp. 100–105.Google Scholar
[5] Ehrenfried, A.D. “Market Development — the Neglected Companion of Product Development,” IRE Transactions of the Professional Group on Engineering Management, Vol. Em-3, No. 1, January 1956, p.8.Google Scholar
[6] Fishel, Walter L. The Resources Allocation Process in Public Agricultural Research, Paper Presented at the Symposium on Resource Allocation in the Agricultural Reserch, Minneapolis, Minnesota, February 23–25, 1969.Google Scholar
[7] Griliches, Zvi. “Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 66, October 1958, pp. 419–431.Google Scholar
[8] Heady, Earl O. “The Contribution of Agricultural Research and Education to Society,” in New Dimensions for Colleges of Agriculture in a Changing World, A Symposium Presented by the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges, Washington, D.C., November 11-12, 1968, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
[9] Irving, George W. Jr., and Samuel B., Detwiler Jr. “Expanding the Uses of Farm Products,” in Farmer's World, The Yearbook of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1964, pp. 571–575.Google Scholar
[10] Levinson, Horace C. “Chance and Statistics,” in Scientific Decision Making in Business, New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1963, pp. 272–287.Google Scholar
[11] Noltingk, B. E. The Human Element in Research Management, Amsterdam; Elsevier Publishing Co., 1959.Google Scholar
[12] Peterson, Willis L. “Return to Poultry Research in the United States,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 49, No. 3, August 1967, pp. 656–669.Google Scholar
[13] Peterson, Willis L. The Returns to Investment in Agricultural Research in the United States, Staff Paper P69-5, Institute of Agriculture, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, April 1968.Google Scholar
[14] Seiler, Robert E. Improving the Effectiveness of Research and Development, New York; McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965, p. 153.Google Scholar
[15] Tichenor, Phillip J., and Ruttan, Vernon W..Resource Allocation in Agricultural Research: The Minnesota Symposium, University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, February 23–25, 1969.Google Scholar
[16] U.S. Congress. Strengthening Research on Utilization of Agricultural Commodities, Senate Document No. 34, 88th Congress, 1st Session, Washington, D.C., September 1963.Google Scholar
[17] U.S. Department of Agriculture.Acniguemente in Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C., October 1966.Google Scholar
[18] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Summary Reports of Utilization Research and Development, 1959-1971, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
[19] Villers, Raymond. Research and Development: Planning and Control, New York: Financial Executives Research Foundation, 1964, p. 46.Google Scholar
[20] Walters, J.E. Research Management: Principles and Practice, Washington; D.C, Spartan Books, 1965.Google Scholar