Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:43:47.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Removal of the Peanut Program on Georgia Production and Distribution of Selected Fresh Produce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

J. E. Epperson ,
H. L. Tyan  and
D. H. Carley
J. E. Epperson
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
H. L. Tyan
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
D. H. Carley
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been conjectured that elimination of the U.S. peanut program would have a profound impact on the supply of fresh produce grown in the peanut producing area of Georgia. Awareness regarding this possibility was brought to bear for two reasons: a) the nature of peanut legislation in 1977 and subsequent years has created a great deal of speculation concerning the possible elimination or phasing out of the program and b) fresh vegetables and fruits produced for the national market and peanuts under the peanut program represent high value crops.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , July 1982 , pp. 153 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. M., King, G. A., and Johnston, W. E.. “Effects of Energy Cost Increases and Regional Allocation Policies on Agricultural Production.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 59(1977):444–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, D. H.Estimation of Economic Relationships in the U.S. Peanut Economy. University of Georgia, Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 212, 1978.Google Scholar
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, United States Senate. Costs of Producing Selected Crops in the United States—1978, 1979, and Projections for 1980. 96th Cong., 2nd sess., Committee Print, 1980.Google Scholar
Dahlgran, R. A. “Welfare Costs and Interregional Income Transfers Due to Regulation of Dairy Markets.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980): 288–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Frank N. and White, Fred C.. “Marketing Quotas as an Alternative to the Present Price Support Program for Peanuts.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 8(1976):91–99.Google Scholar
Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, Farm Management Department. Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis. Misc. Pubi. No. 27, 1977.Google Scholar
Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, Farm Management Department. Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis. Misc. Pubi. No. 48, 1977.Google Scholar
Georgia Crop Reporting Service. Georgia Agricultural Facts, 1975-1976. Georgia Crop Reporting Service, 1980.Google Scholar
Hammig, Michael, Conway, Roger, Shapouri, Hosein, and Yanagida, John. “The Effects of Shifts in Supply on the World Sugar Market.” Agr. Econ. Res. 34(1982): 12–18.Google Scholar
Johnson, Allen O.Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures. Agr. Econ. Report 138, 1978 Supplement, Washington, D.C.: USDA, 1980.Google Scholar
Little, Thomas W., Paxton Marshall, J., and Kline, Ralph G.. Alternative Plans for Peanuts. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Research Report A.E. 11, 1974.Google Scholar
Mairo, Alfred. “Analysis of the World Market for U.S. Peanut Production.” M.S. thesis, University of Georgia, 1978.Google Scholar
Mann, Jitendar S. “Techniques to Measure Social Benefits and Costs in Agriculture: A Survey.” Agr. Econ. Res. 29(1977): 115–26.Google Scholar
McGill, J. Frank. Forty Years of Policy Impact on the Family Peanut Farm. Special Report for the U.S. Senate Agricultural Committee, 1979.Google Scholar
Miller, Bill R.Peanut Policy Issues for the 1981 Farm Bill. University of Georgia, Agr. Exp. Sta. Special Pubi. 12, 1981.Google Scholar
Takayama, T. and Judge, G. G.. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North Holland Publication Company, 1971, pp. 233–51.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics, 1963 to 1978. Washington, D.C., 1963-1978. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Annual Market Summaries. Various Reports.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Annual Market Summaries. Fruit and Vegetable Division, Market News Branch. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Unload Totals, for 41 Cities. Washington, D.C.: USDA, FVUS-5(1974), May 1975.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Annual Market Summaries. Fruit and Vegetable Division, Market News Branch. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Unload Totals, for 41 Cities. Washington, D.C.: USDA, FVUS-5(1975), June 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1974 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, Part 10, Georgia State and County Data, Book 1 Summary Data. Washington, D.C., 1974.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Population Estimates and Projections, Series P-25. Various Reports.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Survey of Current Business, August 1978. Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Printing Office. “Poundage Quota Regulations for the 1982 Crop of Peanuts.” Federal Register. 47(45) (1982): 9972–9980.Google Scholar