Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:01:05.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic Impact of the Mercedes Benz Investment on the State of Alabama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ellene Kebede  and
Mudiayi Sylvain Ngandu
Ellene Kebede
Affiliation:
Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, Alabama
Mudiayi Sylvain Ngandu
Affiliation:
Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of its strategy to attract new businesses, in 1994 the State of Alabama won the Mercedes Benz bid to establish an automobile assembly plant in Vance, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama at the cost of $222 to $253 million worth of incentives. The study assessed the economic impact of the Mercedes Benz investment using IMPLAN. The IMPLAN industry code 49, industrial construction, and industry code 384, motor vehicle, were used to project the impact of the investment for the construction and production phases respectively. The results from four scenarios indicated that the investment would generate sizable direct and indirect employment, income, output, and tax revenue for the state economy. From the estimated revenue, the pay-out period for the cost of the incentive would be from four to seven years. The scenarios also indicated that the increase in the volume of locally purchased automobile parts will increase the multiplier effects for the state economy. Currently, the direct benefits from suppliers accrue to other states with established suppliers networks. The finding also suggested a heavy concentration of the impact of Mercedes Benz plant in the north and northeast part of the state. These counties were also the beneficiaries of past agglomeration economies in terms of critical physical infrastructure and human resource development.

Keywords

economic impactIMPLANMercedes Benzspin-off effects
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , August 1999 , pp. 371 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alabama Department of Revenue. Alabama Incentives for Industry, July, 1994Google Scholar
Alabama Development Office. Project Rosewood Agreement With State of Alabama, Mercedes-Benz Project, Inc. Montgomery, Alabama: Alabama Development Office, September, 1993.Google Scholar
Alabama Development Office. “Report on the Alabama Incentive Program.” Montgomery, Alabama: Alabama Development Office, Research Department, Unpublished, June, 1995.Google Scholar
Alabama Development Office. Location of Mercedes Benz Part Suppliers. Montgomery, Alabama: Alabama Development Office, Research Department, Unpublished, October, 1997.Google Scholar
Alward, G.S. “Local and Regional Impacts of Outdoor Recreation Development.” The President's Commission on Americans Outdoors: A Literature Review. December 1986.Google Scholar
Bairak, R. I. and Hughes, D. W.. “Evaluating the Impacts of Agricultural Exports on a Regional Economy.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28(December 1996):393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkley, D. L. and McNamara, K. T.. Foreign-Owned Manufacturing in the Non-Metropolitan South: What Can Communities Expect. Mississippi: Southern Rural Development Center, 1992.Google Scholar
Blair, J. P.Local Economic Development: Analysis and Practice. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publication, 1996.Google Scholar
Blair, J. P. and Premus, R.. “Major Factors in Industrial Location: A Review.” Economic Development Quarterly 1,1(1987):72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crihfield, J. B. and Campbell, H. S. Jr. “Evaluating Alternative Regional Planning Models.” Growth and Change A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy 22:2(1991): 1–16.Google Scholar
Dorsey, W., “Project Rosewood: the Mercedes-Benz Siting Strategy,” Site Selection and Industrial Development 39:28(1994):245–251.Google Scholar
Greenhut, M.L.Plant Location in Theory and Practice. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.W. and Warf, B.. Industrial Location Principles, Practice, and Policy. London: Routledege, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, J. S. “Survey of Location Decision in the South,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (June 1982):6–19.Google Scholar
Herzog, H. W. Jr. and Schlottmann, A. M. (eds). Industry Location and Public Policy. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hewing, G. J. D.Regional Input-Output Analysis. London, New Delhi: Sage Publication, 1985.Google Scholar
Higgins, B. and Savioie, D. J.. Regional Development Theories and Their Applications. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Hirshman, A. O.The Strategy of Economic Development. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Isard, W. “Location Theory, Agglomeration and Patterns of World Trade,” The International Allocation of Economic Activity. Proceedings of a Nobel Symposium held at Stockholm, eds., Ohlin, Bertil, Hesselborn, Pe-ove, and Wijkman, Per Magnus. New York: Holmes and Meier, Ine, 1977.Google Scholar
Knox, P. and Agnew, J.. The Geography of the World Economy: An Introduction to Economic Geography. London: Edward Arnold, 1994Google Scholar
McPherson, E. M.Plant Location Selection Techniques. Park Ridge, New Jersey: Noyes Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
Miller, R.E. and Blair, P.D.. Input-Output Analysis, Foundation and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1985.Google Scholar
Minnesota IMPLAN Group (MIG). 1994 Alabama State Data. Stillwater, Minnesota: MIG, Inc., 1997.Google Scholar
Newman, R. J. “Industry Migration And Growth in the South.” The Review of Economics and Statistics LXV, 1 (February 1983):76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngandu, M. and Kebede, E., “Foreign Investment, Jobs, Equity, Rural Development, And the Emerging Automobile Industry in the Southeast.” Research Working Paper # 96-1, George Washington Carver Agricultural Experiment Station and The School of Agriculture and Home Economics, Tuskegee University, 1996.Google Scholar
Office of the State Planning and Federal Programs. Alabama State Plan for Economic Growth and Development. Montgomery, Alabama, 1979.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. W.Regional Economics: location theory, urban structure and regional changes. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. W.Regional Growth Theory. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd. 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmenner, R. W.Making Business Location Decisions. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1982.Google Scholar
Scott, A. J.Regions and The World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition, and Political Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Smith, D.M.Industrial Location. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1981.Google Scholar
Steinnes, D. N. “Business Climate, Tax Incentives, and Regional Economic Development.” Journal of Public Urban, and Regional Policy 15: 2(1984):38–47.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Metropolitan Statistical Areas as Defined by the Office of Management and Budget, Bureau of the Census, December, 1984.Google Scholar
Webber, M. J.Industrial Location. London New Delhi: SAGE publication, 1984Google Scholar
Weber, A.Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: Translated by C.J. Fiedrich. University of Chicago, 1933.Google Scholar