Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:30:28.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Impact of Federal Marketing Orders — The Florida Winter Tomato Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

John R. Brooker  and
James L. Pearson
John R. Brooker
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, with the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
James L. Pearson
Affiliation:
Commodity Economic Division Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., and was formerly Stationed at Gainesville, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Marketing agreements and orders have been used for several decades by various commodity groups in an effort to stabilize and increase the level of farm income. These programs are tools to be used in a “self-help” fashion. They do not automatically solve an industry's marketing problems. For instance, if an industry has continuous interseasonal supply control difficulties, a marketing agreement may actually aggravate the problem it was intended to solve. However, intraseasonal volume controls can relieve short-run imbalances in supply while not adversely affecting consumers. Merging long-run and short-run perspectives is the problem that creates difficulty in program evaluation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Brooker, John R. “Systems Analysis of the United States Winter Fresh Tomato Industry,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1973.Google Scholar
[2] Brooker, John R. and Pearson, James L.. Winter Fresh Tomato Industry — Systems Analysis, Agricultural Economics Research Report (at printer). Commodity Economic Division, ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
[3] Cyert, Richard M. “A Description and Evaluation of Some Firm Simulations.” Proceedings of the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Simulation Models and Gaming, White Plains, N.Y.: IBM, 1966.Google Scholar
[4] Hamilton, H.R. et.al. Systems Simulation for Regional Analysis, an Application to River-Basin Planning, Cambridge, Massuchusetts: The M.I.T. Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[5] Johnson, S.R. and Rausser, Gordon C.. “A Survey of Systems Analysis and Simulation in Agricultural Economics,” Paper presented at AAEA meeting, Gainesville, Florida, 1972.Google Scholar
[6] Meier, R.C., Newell, W.T. and Pazer, H.L.. Simulation in Business and Economics, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969.Google Scholar
[7] Naylor, T.H. Computer Simulation Experiments with Models of Economic Systems, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[8] Naylor, T.H. Computer Simulation Techniques, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[9] Orcutt, G.H. “Simulation of Economic Systems,” The American Economic Review, Vol. L, No. 5, December 1960, pp. 893–907.Google Scholar
[10] Report of Interagency Task Force. Price Impacts of Federal Market Order Programs, Special Report 12, Farmer Cooperative Service U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., January 7, 1975.Google Scholar