Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:45:01.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution of the Costs and Benefits of Public Schooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

David W. Holland
David W. Holland*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Arthur Okun recently observed that even in economics the times are changing. Whereas the focus of the profession in the early 1960's was on the aggregative issues – mainly lagging economic growth – it has now shifted to a considerable degree to the distributive issues. Particular attention is being given to the problems of the low end of the distribution – “the poverty problem.” In agricultural economics we are witnessing a somewhat similar trend with increasing interest and professional time being allocated to rural poverty and rural development.

One of the manifestations of the trend in both general and agricultural economics to examine distributional questions has been a substantial increase in studies of the distributional impact of various public programs [cf. 6, 7, 23, 24]. Both because of the magnitude of expenditure involved and its presumed role in providing equality of opportunity, education has received particular attention. Consequently substantial literature has now been accumulated on the distributive impact of public schooling.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , July 1973 , pp. 71 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Report of the Commission, The Role of Equalization in Federal Grants, Washington: U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1964.Google Scholar
[2]Samuel, Bowles, and Levin, Henry M., “The Determinants of Scholastic Achievement - An Appraisal of Some Recent Evidence,” Journal of Human Resources, 3(Winter, 1968):3–24.Google Scholar
[3]Bieker, Richard F., and Anschel, Kurt R., “Estimating Educational Production Functions Using Curriculum as the Basic Educative Unit: Some Findings,” Journal Article 72-1-52 of the Kentucky Agri. Exp. Station, Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
[4]Coleman, James S., et al.Equality of Educational Opportunity, Washington: U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1966.Google Scholar
[5]Coons, John E., Clune, William H., and Sugarman, Stephen D., Private Wealth and Public Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[6]Gillespie, Irwin W., “Effect of Public Expenditure on the Distribution of Income,” Essays in Fiscal Federalism, Edited by Musgrave, Richard A.. The Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C., 1965, 122–186.Google Scholar
[7]Grubb, Norton W., “The Distribution of Costs and Benefits in an Urban Public School System,” National Tax Journal, 24(1): 1–12, March, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hansen, Lee W., “Income Distribution Effects of Higher Education,” American Economic Review, 60(2): 335–340, May, 1970.Google Scholar
[9]Hansen, Lee W., and Weisbrod, Burton A.. Benefits, Costs, and Finance of Public Higher Education, Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, 1969.Google Scholar
[10]Hartman, Robert W., “A Comment on the Pechman-Hansen-Weisbrod Controversy,” Journal of Human Resources, 5(Fall, 1970): 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hartman, Robert W., “Equity Implications of State Tuition Policy and Student Loans,” Journal of Political Economy, 80(3-11): 142–171, May/June, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hines, F.K., “Optimal Allocation of Funds for Schooling Among Geographic Division Within the United States,” unpublished Ph.D.Thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1970.Google Scholar
[13]Holland, David W., “The Geographic and Income Class Distribution of the Benefits and Costs of Public Education - Implications for Common School Finance,” unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1972.Google Scholar
[14]Jencks, Christopher, et al.Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America, 1972. Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
[15]Johnson, Harry G., “The Alternatives Before Us,” Journal of Political Economy, 80(3-11): 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Levin, Henry M., “Schooling and Inequality: The Social Science Objectivity Gap,” Saturday Review-Education, 49–51, Dec, 1972.Google Scholar
[17]Musgrave, Richard A., and Daicoff, Darwin W.. “Who Pays the Michigan Taxes?” Michigan Tax Study -Staff Papers, Lansing, Michigan, 1958.Google Scholar
[18]National Educational Finance Project, Alternative Programs for Financing Education, Volume 5, Gainesville, Florida, 1971.Google Scholar
[19]Oklahoma Tax Commission. Fifteenth Biennial Report, 1960-1962, Oklahoma City: 1962.Google Scholar
[20]Okun, Arthur M., “Dynamics of Income Distribution - Discussion,” American Economic Review, 60(c): 296–299, May, 1970.Google Scholar
[21]Pechman, Joseph A., “The Distributional Effects of Public Higher Education in California,” Journal of Human Resources, 5(Summer, 1970): 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Schultz, T. W., ed. “Investment in Education: The Equity-Efficiency Quandary,” Special supplement Journal of Political Economy, 80(3-11): 1–292, May/June, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Tax Foundation Inc., Tax Burden and Benefits of Government Expenditures by Income Class, 1961 and 1965, New York: 1967.Google Scholar
[24]Tweeten, Luther G., and Ray, Darrel. “Impact of Public Compensation Policies.” Journal Article P-35 of the Agri. Exp. Sta., Oklahoma State University, 1972.Google Scholar
[25]U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Farm Income Situation. Washington: U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1971.Google Scholar
[26]U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, 1964 United States Census of Agriculture, Vol. 1, Part 36, Oklahoma, Washington: U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1965.Google Scholar
[27]U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditures and Income - Cross Classification of Family Characteristics Total Southern Region, Urban, and Rural, 1960-61, BLS Report No. 237-238, Supplement 2. Washington: U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1966.Google Scholar
[28]White, Fred C, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors Affecting Elementary and Secondary Schooling Quality in Oklahoma with Economic Application for Rural Areas,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1971.Google Scholar
[29]Windham, Douglas W., Education, Equality and Income Redistribution, Lexington: Heath and Company, 1970.Google Scholar