Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:00:16.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Determinants of Food Stamp Program Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

J. E. Epperson ,
C. L. Huang ,
S. M. Fletcher  and
W. K. Scearce
J. E. Epperson
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station. W. K.
C. L. Huang
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station. W. K.
S. M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station. W. K.
W. K. Scearce
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Food Stamp Act of 1964 (with subsequent amendments) charges the U.S. Department of Agriculture with extending the benefits of the program to all households willing and eligible to participate. This duty was reinforced by a federal court ruling in 1975 (Beckel and MacDonald; Bennett et al. vs. Butz et al.).

Because of the importance of the Food Stamp Program (FSP), numerous studies have been conducted to gauge its intended effectiveness. Areas of study have included nutritional benefits of the program, impact on food expenditures, identification of ways to improve the rate of program participation, and identification of socioeconomic characteristics that may be important indicators of participation or nonparticipation in the program (for example, see Davis and Neenan; Lane; Neenan and Davis 1977, 1978; Salathe; Scearce et al.; Smith and Rowe; West; USDA, 1976, 1978).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1980 , pp. 93 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, T. “Qualitative Response Models.” Ann. Econ. Soc. Meas. 4(1975):363–72.Google Scholar
Beckel, G. and MacDonald, M.. “Participation Rates in the Food Stamp Program: Estimated Levels, by State,” Dis. Pap. 253-75. Madison, Wisconsin: Institute for Research on Poverty, 1975.Google Scholar
Bennett, J.et al. vs. Butz, E. L.et al. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division, Federal Supplement, Vol. 386, West Publishing Company, 1974.Google Scholar
Davis, C. G. and Neenan, P. H.. “Impact of Food Stamp and Nutrition Education Programs on Food Group Expenditure and Nutrient Intake of Low Income Households.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1979):121–9.Google Scholar
Deyak, Timothy A. and Smith, V. Kerry. “Congestion and Participation in Outdoor Recreation: A Household Production Function Approach.” Paper presented at Winter Meetings of Econometric Society, Dallas, Texas, Dec. 1975.Google Scholar
Faulkinberry, Patricia. “Federal Food Dollars Go South.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Econ. Rev. 62(1977):135–41.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J.Probit Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A. S.Econometric Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1964.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, Henry and Sexauer, Benjamin. “The Demand for Home-Produced Food by Rural Families.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, S. “Food Distribution and Food Stamp Program Effects on Food Consumption and Nutritional ‘Achievement’ of Low Income Persons in Kern County, California.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):108–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, Zarembka, P. ed. New York: Academic Press, 1974, p. 105-42.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. ”Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey.” Ann. Econ. Soc. Meas. 5(1976):363–90.Google Scholar
Neenan, P. H. and Davis, C. G.. “Impact of the Food Stamp Program on Low Income Household Food Consumption in Rural Florida.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1977):89–98.Google Scholar
Neenan, P. H. and Davis, C. G.. Impact of the Food Stamp and Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Programs on Food Expenditure and Nutrient Intake of Low Income Rural Florida Households. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 805,1978.Google Scholar
Prochaska, Fred J. and Schrimper, R. A.. “Opportunity Cost of Time and Other Socioeconomic Effects on Away-From-Home Food Consumption.” A mer. J. Agr. Econ. 55(1973):595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salathe, Larry E. “The Impact of the Food Stamp Program on Household Food Purchases.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61(1979):1143.Google Scholar
Scearce, W.Keith, J. Marshall Paxton, and Jensen, Robert B.. Food Stamps: A Study in Two Virginia Localities. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, 1975.Google Scholar
Smith, L. W. and Rowe, G.. Food Stamp Participation of Hired Farm Worker Families. AER-403. Washington, D.C: USDA ESCS, 1978.Google Scholar
Stucker, Thomas A. and Boehm, William T.. A Guide to Understanding the 1977 Food and Agricultural Legisbtion. Agr. Econ. Rep. 411, USDA, ESCS, Sept. 1978.Google Scholar
West, Donald A. “Food Expenditures and the Food Stamp Program: Some Recent Evidence From the Consumer Expenditure Survey.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61(1979):1143.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Characteristics of Food Stamp Households. Food and Nutrition Service Rep. FNS-168, Sept. 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Food Stamp Program: A Review of Selected Economic Studies. USDA ESCS 34, Sept. 1978.Google Scholar