Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:21:39.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demand Relationships Among Juice Beverages: A Differential Demand System Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Mark G. Brown ,
Jonq-Ying Lee  and
James L. Seale Jr.
Mark G. Brown
Affiliation:
Florida Department of Citrus
Jonq-Ying Lee
Affiliation:
Florida Department of Citrus
James L. Seale Jr.
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nielsen ScanTrack data were used to study how income and prices influenced consumer juice beverage demand in the United States during the period from 1988-89 through 1991-92. Alternative differential demand models combining the features of the Rotterdam model and the almost ideal demand system (AIDS) were tested. Results indicate the CBS type demand responses describe consumer behavior better than the other specifications for this particular data set.

Keywords

differential demand systemsjuice beverages
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , December 1994 , pp. 417 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston J. M., and Chalfant, J. A. “The Silence of the Lambdas: A Test of the Almost Ideal and Rotterdam Models,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75 (1993): 304–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amemiya, T.Advanced Econometrics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Attfield, C.L.F. “Homogeneity and Endogeneity in Systems of Demand Equations,” Journal of Economics, 27(1985): 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attfield, C.L.F. “Estimation and Testing When Explanatory Variables are Endogenous,” Journal of Economics, 48(1991): 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Consumer Demand Functions Under Conditions of Almost Additive Preferences,” Econometrica, 32(1964): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Evidence on the Slutsky Conditions for Demand Equations,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 (1967): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Estimating Demand Equations,” Econometrica, 36 (1968): 213–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations,” European Economic Review, 1 (1969): 7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Consumer Allocation Models: Choice of Functional Form,” Catholic University of Leuven and CORE, December 1990.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R. and Savin, N. E. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances,” Econometrica, 43 (1975): 937–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieri, J. and de Janvry, A. “Empirical Analysis of Demand Under Consumer Budgeting,” Giannini Foundation Monograph No. 30, September 1972.Google Scholar
Bewley, R.Allocation Models: Specification. Estimation, and Applications, Cambridge, Mass.:Ballinger Publishing Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Bewley, R., Young, T., and Coiman, D. “A System Approach to Modelling Supply Equations in Agriculture,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, 38(1987): 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. G. and Lee, J. “Orange and Grapefruit Juice Demand Forecasts,” in Food Demand Analysis: Implications for Future Consumption, edited by Capps, O. Jr. and Senauer, B., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1986.Google Scholar
Brown, M. G. and Lee, J. “A Dynamic Differential Demand System: An Application of Translation,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24(2, 1992): 1–10.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. S. “The Analysis of Consumer Demand in the United Kingdom, 1900-70,” Econometrica, 42 (1974):341–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. S. “Specification and Testing in Applied Demand Analysis,” The Economic Journal, 88(1978): 524–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. S. and Muellbauer, J. “An Almost Ideal Demand System,” American Economic Review, 70 (1980):Google Scholar
Duffy, M. H. “Advertising and the InterProduct Distribution of Demand,” European Economic Review, 31(1987): 1051–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J. S. and Unnevehr, L. J. “Demand for Beef and Chicken Products: Separability and Structural Change,” American J. of Agricultural Economics, 70(1988): 521–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J. S. and Unnevehr, L. J. “Simultaneity and Structural Changes in Meat U. S. Demand,” American J. of Agricultural Economics, 75(1993): 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, L. R., Finke, R., and Theil, H. “An Evaluation of Alternative Demand Systems by Means of Implied Income Elasticities,” Economics Letters, 15 (1984): 21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, W. J. and van, J. Driel “Differential Consumer Demand Systems,” European Economic Review, 27 (1985): 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, J. T. “When is Expenditure ‘Exogenous’ in Separable Demand Models?” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16(1991): 49–62.Google Scholar
Lee, J. “Demand Interrelationships Among Fruit Beverages,” Southern J. of Agricultural Economics, 16(2); 135-43, 1984.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Brown, M. G., and Seale, J. L., Jr. “Demand Relationships Among Fresh Fruit and Juices in Canada,” Review of Agricultural Economics, 14: 255–62, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, P. “Analysis of Consumer Demand in Portugal, 1958-1981,” Memoire de maîtrise en sciences économiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1987.Google Scholar
Seale, J. L. Jr. and Theil, H. “Income and Price Sensitivity in Demand Systems, Part I: Income Sensitivity,” in Economic Models. Estimation and Socioeconomic Systems: Essays in Honor of Karl A. Fox, edited by Kaul, T. K. and Sengupta, J.K., Amsterdam: Elsvier Science Publishers, 1991, pp. 141–54.Google Scholar
Theil, H. “The Information Approach to Demand Analysis,” Econometrica, 33 (1965): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. “The Theory of Rational Random Behavior and Its Application to Demand Analysis,” European Economic Review, 6(1975): 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H.Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand, New York: North-Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
Theil, H.The System-Wide Approach to Microeconomics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Theil, H. and Clements, K. W. “A Differential Approach to U.S. Import Demand,” Economics Letters, 1(1978): 249–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. and Clements, K. W.Applied Demand Analysis: Results from System-Wide Approaches, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1987.Google Scholar
Working, H. “Statistical Laws of Family Expenditure,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 38 (1943): 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar