Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:40:06.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cotton Acreage Effects of Boll Weevil Eradication: A County-Level Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Christopher F. Dumas  and
Rachael E. Goodhue
Christopher F. Dumas
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, North Carolina
Rachael E. Goodhue
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The success of the Boll Weevil Eradication (BWE) Program is believed to be one factor underlying the recent increase in cotton acreage in the Southeast. We find weak evidence that the initial, eradication phase of the BWE program decreases cotton acreage, and strong evidence that the second, maintenance phase of the program increases acreage. The full benefits associated with a BWE program may not become apparent until acreage adjustments occur, four to five years after program initiation. Our results indicate that for a representative sample county neglecting acreage effects may lead to underestimation of BWE program net benefits by 9 percent-12 percent.

Keywords

acreage effects and policy evaluationboll weevil eradication programcottonintegrated pest management (IPM)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 1999 , pp. 475 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahouissoussi, N.B.C.Economic Returns to the Boll Weevil Eradication Program in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. M.S. Thesis. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1992.Google Scholar
Ahouissoussi, N.B.C., Wetzstein, M.E., and Duffy, P.A.. “Economic Returns to the Boll Weevil Eradication Program.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25(1993):46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorlie, Wayne. Personal communication. USDA-Farm Service Agency. March 1997.Google Scholar
Brown, Steve. University of Georgia, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, Tifton, Georgia. Personal communication. March 1997.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.A. “Cotton Boll Weevil Eradication: Voting and Crop Switching.” Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. Unpublished manuscript. 1991.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.A. 1992. Personal communication. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, July 1992.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.A. Personal communication. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, October, 1995.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.A., G. Sappie, and M. Hammig, . Economic Returns to Boll Weevil Eradication. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 621, 1989.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.A. and L. Suguiyama, . Economic Evaluation of Area-Wide Cotton Insect Management: Boll Weevils in the Southeastern United States. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service. Bulletin 473. 1985.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P., Pop, R.D.. and Kao, R.S.. “An Analysis of the Role of Futures Prices, Cash Prices and Government Programs in Acreage Response.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 8(1983):27–33.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.A., Cain, D.L., Youn, G.J.. and Wetzstein, M.E.. “Effects of the Boll Weevil Eradication Program on Alabama Cotton Farms.” Journal of Agribusiness 12(1991): 1–14.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.A., Richardson, J.W, and Wohlgenant, M.K.. “Regional Cotton Acreage Response.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 19(1987):99–109.Google Scholar
GAASS. 1997. Computer data file. Georgia Agricultural Statistics Service. Athens, Georgia, February 1997.Google Scholar
Glade, E.H. Jr., Meyer, L.A., MacDonald, S.. Cotton: Background for 1995 Farm Legislation. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 706, 1995.Google Scholar
Grube, A. and Carlson, G.A.. Economic Analysis of Cotton Insect Control in North Carolina. Department of Economics and Business, North Carolina State University, Economic Report number 52, 1978.Google Scholar
Heimlich, R.E. and Osborn, C.T.. “The Conservation Reserve Program: What Happens When Contracts Expire?” Choices (Third quarter 1993 issue).Google Scholar
Judge, G., Griffiths, W., Hill, R., Lufkepohl, H. and T. Lee, . The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Second Edition, Wiley Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J.Elements of Econometrics, Second Edition. NY: Macmillan Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar
Mims, A.M., Duff, P.A.. and G. Young, . “Effects of Alternative Acreage Restriction Provisions on Alabama Cotton Farms.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21(1989):85–94.Google Scholar
NCDA. Computer data printout. North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Statistics Division, Raleigh, North Carolina, October 1996.Google Scholar
Parks, R.W. “Efficient Estimation of a System of Regression Equations when Disturbances are Both Serially and Contemporaneously Correlated.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 62(1967):500–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCASS. Mimeo. South Carolina Agricultural Statistical Service. Columbia, South Carolina, October, 1996.Google Scholar
Singletary, H. “North Carolina Boll Weevil Eradication Program Grower, Assessments.” Mimeo. North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Plant Industry Division, Raleigh, North Caroina, March 1997.Google Scholar
Stern, V.M., Smith, R.F., Bosch, R. van den and Hagen, K.S., “The Integrated Control Concept.” Hilgardia 29(1959):81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suguiyama, L. and C. Osteen, . “The Economic Importance of Cotton Insects and Mites.” USDA Economic Research Service, Agricutural Economic Report Number 599, October, 1988.Google Scholar
Szmedra, P. I., McCIendon, R. W., and Wetzstein, M. E.. “Economic Efficiency of Boll Weevil Eradication.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23(1991):237–245.Google Scholar
USDA. Provisions of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981. By Johnson, James D., Rizzi, Richard W., Short, Sara D., and Fulton, R. Thomas, National Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA. Agricultural Economic Report No. 483, 1982.Google Scholar
USDA. Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. By Glaser, Lawrence K.. USDA, Economic Research Service, National Economics Division. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 498, 1986.Google Scholar
USDA. Cotton: Background for 1990 Farm Legislation. By Stults, Harold, Glade, Edward H. Jr., Sanford, Scott, and Meyer, Leslie A.. Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Staff Report No. AGES 89–42, 1989.Google Scholar
USDA. 1990. The Conservation Reserve Program: Enrollment Statistics for Signup Periods 1–9 and Fiscal year 1989. By Osborn, C. Tim, Llacuna, Felix, and Linsenbigler, Michael. Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, USDA. Statistical Bulletin No. 811.Google Scholar
USDA. Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. Edited by Pollack, Susan L. and Lynch, Lori. Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, Economic Research Service, USDA. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 624, 1991.Google Scholar
USDA. “1991b Economic Implications of Planting Flexibility Provisions for U.S. Upland Cotton Farms.” In Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook Report, USDA-ERS CWS-64, May 1991.Google Scholar
USDA. “1991c. New Provisions for Upland Cotton Farm Programs.” In: Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook Report, USDA-ERS. CWS-63, 1991.Google Scholar
USDA. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Costs of Production—Major Field Crops, 1990. Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, USDA, ECTFS 10–4, 1992.Google Scholar
USDA. 1995a. Cotton: Background for 1995 Farm Legislation. By Glade, Edward H. Jr., Meyer, Leslie A., and MacDonald, Stephen. Commercial Agriculture Division, Economic Research Service, USDA Agricultural Economic Report No. 706, 1995.Google Scholar
USDA. 1995b. Upland Cotton: FAS Commodity Fact Sheet. USDA-Farm Service Agency. Washington, DC, September 1995.Google Scholar
USDA. 1996 Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook Yearbook. Commercial Agriculture Division. Economic Research Service, USDA, CWS, 1996.Google Scholar
USDA. 1996b. The Cotton Industry in the United States. Glade, Edward H. Jr., Meyer, Leslie A., and Stults, Harold (eds). Commercial Agriculture Division, Economic Research Service, USDA, Agricultural Economic Report No. 739, 1996.Google Scholar
USDA. News Mimeo. USDA-Farm Services Agency. Washington, DC. Various years.Google Scholar
USDA. Personal communication with Mr. Bill Gre-fenstette, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service, Boll Weevil Eradication Program, November 4, 1997.Google Scholar
USDC. Table No. 751—“Producer Price Index, Crude Materials, Total.” US Statistical Abstract 1996. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC, 1996.Google Scholar
USDC. Statistical Abstract of the United States. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C, various years.Google Scholar
Verhovek, S. H. “In South Texas, a Swat at an Old Pest Stirs a Revolt.” New York Times. January 24, 1996.Google Scholar
White, K.J.SHAZAM User's Reference Manual Version 8.0. McGraw-Hill, 1997.Google Scholar