Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:21:34.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on Energy Problems and Alternatives: Implication for the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James C. Hite*
Affiliation:
My general reaction to Debertin and Pagolatos' presentation is that it is too narrow. In looking at the implications of higher liquid fuel costs for Southern agriculture, Debertin and Pagolatos have concentrated almost exclusively on on-farm adjustments. It is important to try to understand such adjustments, and the report is helpful as a starting place for further analysis. But the on-farm adjustments to higher liquid fuel prices are not independent of other adjustments taking place beyond the farm gate — adjustments in the agricultural sector generally and in the total economy. Indeed, there is a simultaneity in the overall adjustment process that not only makes the production economices perspective too narrow but also suggests the need for a general, as opposed to partial, equilibrium perspective.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Economics, Statistics and Cooperatives Services, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Another Revolution in U.S. Farming? Agr. Inf. Bull. No. 433, 1980.Google Scholar
Landowner, Vol. 1, No. 2, Nov. 26, 1979, p. 1.Google Scholar
Steinhart, C. E. and Steinhart, J. S.. Energy: Use and Role in Human Affairs. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1974.Google Scholar