Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:27:03.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coastal Erosion Management from a Community Economics Perspective: The Feasibility and Efficiency of User Fees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Warren Kriesel
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Applied Economics Department, University of Georgia
Craig E. Landry
Affiliation:
Economics Department, East Carolina University
Andrew Keeler
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Management, The Ohio State University

Abstract

Coastal communities cannot depend on funding from the state or federal government to maintain high-quality beaches that benefit the public and attract tourist revenues. This article investigates the feasibility and efficiency of beach improvement projects at two Georgia barrier islands through the alternative funding mechanisms of general-revenue financing and user fees. Benefits are calculated from an intensive, on-site survey of beach visitors, and the costs are calculated from observable sources. The analyses presented support beach improvement as an effective policy on both islands under all scenarios considered.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, T.A.A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 15(1988):355–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
Kaoru, Y.Discrete-Choice Contingent Valuation of Beach Recreation Benefits for Tourists and Local Residents.” Working paper 8500, Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Océanographie Institution. 1993.Google Scholar
Kriesel, W, Keeler, A.G., and Landry, C.E.. “Financing Beach Improvements: Comparing Two Approaches on the Georgia Coast.Coastal Management 32(2004):433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, C.E., Keeler, A.G., and Kriesel, W.. “An Economic Evaluation of Beach Erosion Management Alternatives.Marine Resource Economics 18(2003):105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leatherman, S.RModes of Shoreline Behavior: Erosion Rate Analysis Using Geomorphic Principles.” Proceedings of International Coastal Symposium, Hilton Head Island, SC, pp. 218-23. 1993.Google Scholar
Marlowe, H.Wishing—and Working—For More Federal Funding for Beach Restoration.Shore and Beach 69(2001):8.Google Scholar
Oertel, G.F., Foster, W.G., and Graham, W.R.. “Elements of a Successful Beach Management Plan, Sea Island, Georgia.” Proceedings of the 1996 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology. Tallahassee: Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association, 1996.Google Scholar
Parsons, G.R. and Powell, M.. “Measuring the Costs of Beach Retreat.Coastal Management 29(2001):91103.Google Scholar
Randall, A.Resource Economics, 2nd ed. New York, New York: John Wiley and Son, 1987.Google Scholar
Shaffer, R., Délier, S., and Marcouiller, D.. Community Economics, 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Shaw, D.On-Site Samples’ Regression: Problems of Non-Negative Numbers, Truncation and Endogenous Stratification.Journal of Econometrics 37(1988):211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stronge, W.B.Matching Costs and Benefits of Beach Projects.” Proceedings of the 1999 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology. Tallahassee: Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association 1999.Google Scholar
Teaseley, R. Jeff, Bergstrom, John C., and Ken Cordell, H.. “Estimating Revenue-Capture Potential Associated with Public Area Recreation.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(1994):89101.Google Scholar