Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:58:56.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Best Management Practices to Enhance Water Quality: Who is Adopting Them?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Pascal L. Ghazalian ,
Bruno Larue  and
Gale E. West
Pascal L. Ghazalian
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Bruno Larue
Affiliation:
Center for Research on the Economics of Agri-Food (CREA) and Department of Agri-Food Economics and Consumer Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Gale E. West
Affiliation:
CREA and Department of Agri-Food Economics and Consumer Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants affecting producers' adoption of some Best Management Practices (BMPs). Priors about the signs of certain variables are explicitly accounted for by testing for inequality restrictions through importance sampling. Education, gender, age, and on-farm residence are found to have significant effects on the adoption of some BMPs. Farms with larger animal production are more apt to implement manure management practices, crop rotation, and riparian buffer strips. Also, farms with larger cultivated acres are more inclined to implement herbicide control practices, crop rotation, and riparian buffer strips. Belonging to an agro-environment club has a positive impact for most BMPs.

Keywords

adoptionBayesian analysisbest management practicespriorsrunoffwater qualityQ12Q25C11
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 663 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adesina, A.A., and Chianu., J. “Determinants of Farmers' Adoption and Adaptation of Alley Farming Technology in Nigeria.” Agroforestry Systems 55(2002):99–112.Google Scholar
Adesina, A.A., and Zhinna., M.M. “Technology Characteristics, Farmers' Perceptions and Adoption Decisions: A Tobit Model Application in Sierra Leone.” Agricultural Economics 9(1993): 297–311.Google Scholar
Amemiya, T. “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 19(1981): 1483–536.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Martin, S.W., Roberts, R.K., Larkin, S.L., Larson, J.A., Paxton, K.W., English, B.C., Marra, M.C., and Reeves., J.M. “A Binary Lagit Estimation of Factors Affecting Adoption of GPS Guidance Systems by Cotton Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008):345–55.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, M.S. “Intensive Livestock Farming: Does Farm Size Matter?” Statistics Canada Agriculture and Rural Working Paper No. 48. Ottawa, ON, 2001.Google Scholar
Borsch-Supan, A., and Hajivassiliou., V.A. “Smooth Unbiased Multivariate Probability Simulators for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Journal of Econometrics 58(1993):347–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalfant, J., Gray, R., and White., K. “Evaluating Prior Beliefs in a Demand System: The Case of Meats Demand in Canada.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):476–90.Google Scholar
El-Osta, H.S., and Morehart., M.J. “Technology Adoption Decision in Dairy Production and the Role of the Herd Expansion.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 28(1999):84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman., D. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey.” World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 542. Washington, D.C., 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geweke, J. “Exact Inference in the Inequality Constrained Normal Linear Regression Model.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 1(1986): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geweke, J. “Antithetic Acceleration of Monte Carlo Integration in Bayesian Inference.” Journal of Econometrics 38(1988):72–89.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. “Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Monte Carlo Integration.” Econometrica 57(1989): 131740.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. “Efficient Simulation from the Multivariate Normal and Student-t Distributions Subject to Linear Constraints.” Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Symposium on the Interface. Keramidas, E., ed. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1991.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J.M., Davis, C.G., and Rahelizatovo, N.C. “An Evaluation of U.S. Hog Producer Preferences toward Autonomy.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(2004): 575–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J., Kim, S., and Paudel., K. “Why Don't Producers Adopt Best Management Practices? An Analysis of the Beef Cattle Industry.” Agricultural Economics 36(2007):89—102.Google Scholar
Hindsley, P. “Factors Leading to Implementation of Agricultural Best Management Practices on the Neuse River Basin.” M.Sc. thesis. East Carolina University, 2002.Google Scholar
Keane, M.P. “A Computationally Practical Simulation Estimator for Panel Data.” Econometrica 62(1994):95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehrig, R.F. “Agricultural Practices and Water Quality in Saskatchewan: The Social Ecology of Resource Management Practices.” M.Sc. thesis. University of Saskatchewan, 2002.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Gillespie, J.M., and Paudel., K.P. “The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on the Adoption of Best Management Practices in Beef Cattle Production.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(2005): 111–20.Google Scholar
Koop, G. Bayesian Econometrics. West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
Larivière, E., Larue, B., and Chalfant., J. “Modeling the Demand for Alcoholic Beverages and Advertising Specifications.” Agricultural Economics 22(2000): 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, D., and Beaulieu., M.S. “Factors Leading to the Implementation of Beneficial Management Practices for Manure Management on Canadian Hog Operations.” Statistics Canada Research Paper No. 074. Ottawa, ON, 2005.Google Scholar
Nagubadi, V., McNamara, K.T., Hoover, W.L., and Mills., W.L. “Program Participation Behavior of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: A Probit Analysis.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28(1996):323–36.Google Scholar
Nkamleu, G.B., and Adesina., A.A. “Determinants of Chemical Input Use in Peri-urban Lowland Systems: Bivariate Probit Analysis in Cameroon.” Agricultural Systems 63(2000): 111–21.Google Scholar
Paudel, K., Gauthier, W., Westra, J., and Hall., L. “Factors Influencing and Steps Leading to the Adoption of Best Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Farmers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008): 203–22.Google Scholar
Potter, C., and Lobley., M. “Aging and Succession on Family Farms: The Impact on Decision-Making and Land Use.” Sociologia Ruralis 32(1992):317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahelizatovo, N.C., and Gillespie., J.M. “The Adoption of Best-Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(2004): 229–40.Google Scholar
Rahm, M.R., and Huffman., W.E. “The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(1984):405—13.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, W., Larue, B., and Ketchabaw., E.H. “Factors Influencing Productivity Enhancing and Environmental Husbandry on Rental Land.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 43(1995):73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C.E., Vestal, M., Doye, D., and Lalman., D. “Factors Affecting Adoption of Cow-Calf Production Practices in Oklahoma.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008): 851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelezny, L.C., Chua, P.-P., and Aldrich., C. “Elaborating on Gender Differences in Envi-ronmentalism.” The Journal of Social Issues 56(2000):443–57.Google Scholar