Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:26:45.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing Landowner Demand for Wildlife and Forest Management Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ian A. Munn ,
Anwar Hussain ,
Ben West ,
Stephen C. Grado  and
W. Daryl Jones
Ian A. Munn
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Anwar Hussain
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Ben West
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Stephen C. Grado
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
W. Daryl Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Determining appropriate topics and target audiences is essential to design effective educational outreach programs. Based on landowner responses to a mail survey, we determined both the importance and the availability of wildlife and forest management information topics to Mississippi landowners. Combining this information clearly identified the appropriate subject matter for outreach programs—topics important to landowners and for which information was relatively unavailable. The importance of wildlife and forest management information relative to its availability depended on the region, land use patterns, and landowner characteristics, thus demonstrating which segments of the population should be targeted to maximize program impact.

Keywords

complementary log-log linklandowner information needsodds ratioordinal regressionoutreach program budgetC25Q16Q23Q26
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 557 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amacher, G.S., Conway, M.C., and Sullivan, J.. “Econometric Analyses of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: Is There Anything Left to Study?” Journal of Forest Economics 9(2003):137-64.Google Scholar
Ananth, C.V., and Kleinbaum, D.G.. “Regression Models for Ordinal Responses: A Review of Methods and Applications.” International Journal of Epidemiology 26(December 1997):1323-33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bensel, T. “Promoting Certified Sustainable Forestry on Private Woodlots in North-Western Pennsylvania: Challenges and Opportunities.” Local Environment 6(August 2001):257-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatner, K.A., Baugartner, D.M., and Quack, L.R.-enbush. “NIFP Use of Landowner Assistance and Education Programs in Washington State.” Western Journal of Applied Forestry 6(October 1991):90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., and Hughes, J.. “Using Ordinal Regression Model to Analyze Student Satisfaction Questionnaires.” IR Applications 1(2004):1–13.Google Scholar
Daykin, A.R., and Moffatt, P.G.. “Analyzing Ordered Responses: A Review of the Ordered Probit Model.” Understanding Statistics 1(2002):157-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, S., Hanson, T., and Murray, S.. Economic Impact of the Mississippi Farm-Raised Catfish Industry. Publication 2317, Extension Service, Mississippi State University, 2003.Google Scholar
Dillman, D.A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
Dobson, A.J.An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2002.Google Scholar
Feather, P.M., and Amacher, G.S.. “Role of Information in the Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Quality Improvement.” Agricultural Economics 11 (December 1994):159-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisvold, G.B., Fernicola, K., and Langworthy, M.. “Market Returns, Infrastructure and the Supply and Demand for Extension Services.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(August 2001):758-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, J.W., and Hilbe, J.M.. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. College Station, TX: Stata Corp, 2007.Google Scholar
Jones, W.D., Munn, I.A., Grado, S.C., and Jones, J.C.. Fee Hunting: An Income Source for Mississippi’s Non-Industrial, Private Landowners. FWRC Bulletin No. 164, Mississippi State University, 2001.Google Scholar
Just, R.D., Wolf, S.A., Wu, S., and Zilberman, D.. “Consumption of Economic Information in Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(February 2002):39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, F.T.Interpreting Probability Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, E., and Zimmerman, R.. “Information and Farmers’ Attitudes About Pesticides, Water Quality, and Related Environmental Effects.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73(May 1999):227-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londo, J.A. “An Assessment of Mississippi Non-industrial Private Forest Landowners Knowledge of BMPs.” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 4(2004):235-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J.S.Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.Google Scholar
Magill, D.J., McGill, D.W., and Fraser, R.F.. “Refining Outreach to Woodland Owners in West Virginia—Preferred Topics and Assistance Methods.” Journal of Extension 42(August 2004), Internet site: www.joe.org/joe/2004august/rb5.shtml.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P., and Neider, J.A.. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D.Econometric Analysis of Qualitative Response Models,Griliches, Z. and Intriligator, M. eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984, p. 1395-446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Measells, M.K., Grado, S.C., Hughes, H.G., Dunn, M.A., Idassi, J., and Zielinske, B.. “Nonindus-trial Private Forest Landowner Characteristics and Use of Forestry Services in Four Southern States.” Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 29(November 2004):194-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, I.A., and Rucker, R.R.. “The Value of Information Services in a Market for Factors of Production with Multiple Attributes: The Role of Consultants in Private Timber Sales.” Forest Science 40(August 1994):474-96.Google Scholar
National Association of State Foresters. Forestry Statistics: 1998-2002. Internet site: www.stateforesters.org/news.html 2004 (Accessed December 2005).Google Scholar
Ortmann, G.F., Patrick, G.F., Musser, W.N., and Doster, D.H.. 1993. “Use of Private Consultants and Other Sources of Information by Large Cornbelt Farmers.” Agribusiness 9(July 1993):391–402.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, D.A., and Xie, Y.. Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Simonoff, J.S.Analyzing Categorical Data. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G.J. “The Economics of Information.” Journal of Political Economy 69(June 1961):213-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, B., and Messmer, T.A.. “Impacts and Management of Duck-Nest Prédation: The Managers’ View.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 32(September 2004):772-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar