Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:20:33.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of Post Conservation Reserve Program Alternatives In The Texas High Plains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Phillip N. Johnson  and
Eduardo Segarra
Phillip N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Eduardo Segarra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four policy alternatives for CRP lands upon expiration of the current contracts in Hale County, Texas are evaluated using chance-constrained programming. It was found that if CRP contracts are extended at the current average rental rate, 40 percent of the current enrollment would be expected to return to crop production, while 66 percent would return to crop production if the program were eliminated. The results also indicate that the marginal value of CRP payments to producers is lower than the marginal value of deficiency payments.

Keywords

Conservation Reserve Programsoil erosionchance-constrained programming
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 556 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, R.C, and Heady, Earl. Oper. Res. Meth. for Agr. Decisions. The Iowa State University Press, Ames. 1972.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jack, Dillon, John, and Hardaker, Brian. Agr. Decision Anal. The Iowa State University Press, Ames. 1977.Google Scholar
Ervin, R.T., and Johnson, P.N.. “Economic Evaluation Of The Conservation Reserve Program In The Southern High Plains Of Texas.” Report submitted to the SCS State Office for Texas. 1992.Google Scholar
Huszar, Paul, and Piper, S.. “Estimating the Off-site Costs of Wind Erosion in New Mexico.” J. Soil and Water Cons. 41(1986): 414–416.Google Scholar
Johnson, Phillip N., “A Welfare Evaluation of Post-Conservation Reserve Program Alternatives.” Unpublished dissertation, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University. 1993.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Walter. Microeconomic Theory Basic Principles and Extensions. The Dryden Press, Orlando, FL. 1989.Google Scholar
Nowak, Peter J., Schnepf, Max, and Barnes, Roy. “When Conservation Reserve Program Contracts Expire .. A National Survey of Farm Owners and Operators Who Have Enrolled Land in the Conservation Reserve.” Soil and Water Conservation Society. 1990.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tim, Schnepf, Max, and Keim, Russ. “The Future Use of Conservation Reserve Program Acres: A National Survey of Farm Owners and Operators.” Soil and Water Conservation Society. 1993.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, Marc. “Reducing Soil Erosion: Offsite Benefits.” USDA, ERS, Agricultural Economic Report No. 561. 1986.Google Scholar
Segarra, Eduardo, Kramer, Randall, and Taylor, Daniel. “A Stochastic Programming Analysis Of The Farm Level Implications Of Soil Erosion Control.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 17(1985): 147–154.Google Scholar
Stamley, W. L., and Smith, R.M.. “A Conservation Definition of Erosion Tolerance.” Soil Sc. 97(1964): 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA, Conservation Reserve Program Contract Data for Hale County, Texas. Hale County ASCS Office. 1992.Google Scholar