Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:32:39.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Economic Evaluation of Soybean Stink Bug Control Alternatives for the Southeastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

David Chyen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Michael E. Wetzstein
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Robert M. McPherson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology at the Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia
William D. Givan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

Abstract

Methyl parathion or Penncap M (an encapsulated methyl parathion) are used extensively throughout the United States for controlling stink bug pests in soybeans, Glycine Max (L.) Merrill. However, this insecticide is highly toxic to mammals, birds, and non-target arthropods, and thus is less environmentally sound than other insecticides. For environmental and human health considerations, investigating alternative insecticides for control is desired. For this investigation, research based on field experimental data from Florida, Georgia, and Louisiana during the 1988 and 1989 growing seasons were employed. Results indicate that alternative, currently available, and less toxic insecticides may reduce producer costs, increase yield, and improve soybean quality. These alternative insecticides include Scout (tralomethrin), Karate (lambda-cyhalothrin), Orthene (acephate), and Baythroid (cyfluthrin). In terms of improved profits these alternative insecticides may dominate methyl parathion or encapsulated methyl parathion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D.B., and McPherson, R.M.. Control Insects in Soybeans. Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Circular 720, 1990.Google Scholar
Adams, D.B., McPherson, R.M., Jones, D.C., and Horton, D.L.. “Soybean Insects” In Summary of Losses from Insect Damage and Costs of Control in Georgia, 1989, Douce, G.K. and McPherson, R.M., eds. University of Georgia Agr. Exp. Sta. Spec. Pub. 70. Feb 1991.Google Scholar
Cohrssen, J.J., and Covello, V.T.. Risk Analysis: A Guide to Principles and Methods for Analyzing Health and Environmental Risks. The National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1989.Google Scholar
Chyen, D.Evaluation of Soybean Stink Bug Control Alternatives for the Southeastern United States.” M.S. thesis, University of Georgia, 1991.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.Investment and Hysteresis.J. Econ. Perspectives, 6(1992):107132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. “Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices.” Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 156, 1991.Google Scholar
Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. Georgia Pest Control Handbook University of Georgia, 1990 and 1991.Google Scholar
Georgia Crop Reporting Service. Georgia Agricultural Facts. 19831990 issues.Google Scholar
Gilman, D.F., McPherson, R.M., Newsom, L.D., Herzog, D.C., and Williams, C.. “Resistance in Soybeans to the Southern Green Stink Bug.Crop Science, 22(1982):573576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Given, W.D., and Mills, F.. Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis, South Georgia 1989. Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, Mis. Publication 27-S, 1988.Google Scholar
Jenson, R.L., and Newsom, L.D.. “Effect of Stink Bug-Damaged Soybean Seeds on Germination, Emergence, and Yield.J. Econ. Entomology, 65(1972):261264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M., and Pitre, H.N. Jr. “General Sampling Methods for Above-ground Populations of Soybean Arthropods.” Sampling Methods in Soybean Entomology, Kogan, M. and Herzog, D.C., eds. New York: Springer-Verlog, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, R.M., Newsom, L.D., and Farthing, B.F.. “Evaluation of Four Stink Bug Species from Three Genera Affecting Soybean Quality and Yield in Louisiana.“ J. Econ. Entomology, 72(1979):188194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, R.M., and Newsom, L.D.. “Trap Crops for Control of Stink Bugs in Soybean.J. Georgia Entomology Soc. 19(1984):470480.Google Scholar
Segerson, K.Liability for Gromdwater Contemination from Pesticides.J. Environ. Econ. and Management, 19(1990): 227243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmedra, P.I., Wetzstein, M.E., McClendon, R.W.. “The Economic Threshold Under Risk: A Case Study of Soybean Production.“ J. Econ. Entomology, 83(1990):641646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, J.W.Effects of Stink Bug Damage on Soybean Quality” In Soybean Seed Quality and Stand Establishment, Sinclair, J.B. and Jackobs, J.A., eds. INTSOY Series Number 22, College of Agriculture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1982.Google Scholar
Turnipseed, S.G., and Kogan, M.. “Soybean Entomology.” Ann. Rev. of Entomology, 21(1976):247282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. 1982, 1984, 1986, 1988.Google Scholar
Wetzstein, M.E., and Centner, T.J.. “Regulating Agricultural Contamination of Groundwater Through Strict Liability and Negligence Legislation.” J. Environ. Econ. and Management, 22(1992):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzstein, M.E., Szmedra, P.I., McClendon, R.W., and Edwards, D.M.. “Efficiency Criteria and Risk Aversion: An Empirical Evaluation.So. J. Agr. Econ. 20(1988): 171178.Google Scholar
Wier, A.T., and Boethel, D.J.. “Control of Southern Green Stink Bug on Soybean, 1989.Insecticide and Acaricide Tests, 15(1990):289290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar